Implicitly differentiating PDE (multivariable calculus)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the partial derivative dz/dx at the point (1,1,1) for the equation xy + z3x - 2yz = 0, where z is defined as a function of x and y. The correct approach involves applying the chain rule and product rule for differentiation. The final equation derived is y + 3z2x(dz/dx) + z3 - 2y(dz/dx) = 0. The key takeaway is the importance of correctly applying the chain rule in implicit differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of implicit differentiation
  • Familiarity with multivariable calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of the product rule in differentiation
  • Experience with the chain rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study implicit differentiation techniques in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the product rule and chain rule in detail
  • Practice solving partial derivatives with complex functions
  • Explore examples of implicit functions and their derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in multivariable calculus, mathematicians dealing with implicit functions, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of partial derivatives and differentiation techniques.

Legion81
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
The problem:
Find the value of dz/dx at the point (1,1,1) if the equation xy+z3x-2yz=0 defines z as a function of the two independent variables x and y and the partial derivative exists.

I don't know how to approach the z3x part. I thought you would use the product rule and get 3(dz/dx)2x + z3. But if that is right, the final equation looks something like

y + 3x(dz/dx)2 + z3 - 2y(dz/dx) = 0

And I don't think that is right. The only way I know to solve that would be with the quadratic equation and that gives a complex value. Am I forgeting the chain rule somewhere or just way off on approaching this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have done very little multivariable so this could easily be wrong, but if you implicitly differentiated z^3x shouldn't you get 3z^2x*dz/dx + z^3?
 
Frillth said:
I have done very little multivariable so this could easily be wrong, but if you implicitly differentiated z^3x shouldn't you get 3z^2x*dz/dx + z^3?

That's right because you have the 3z2x(dz/dx) + z3(dx/dx). I don't know what I was thinking... Thank You!
 
You didn't apply the chain rule, remember df(u)/dx = f(u)'*du/dx
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K