Impulse and Momentum Conservation for a Frictionless Cart

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a frictionless cart that rebounds after hitting a wall, raising questions about impulse and momentum conservation. The impulse on the cart is calculated as -20 kgm/s, indicating a change in momentum. Participants debate whether momentum is conserved, with some arguing that it depends on how the system is defined, particularly considering the wall and Earth. It is noted that momentum is always conserved in collisions when all objects are accounted for, but the framing of the question may be misleading. Ultimately, understanding the broader system, including the wall's interaction with the Earth, is crucial for analyzing momentum conservation.
Nelson2436
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2 kg frictionless cart with a velocity of 6 m/s hits a wall and rebounds with a velocity of 4 m/s. What is the impulse on the cart by the wall? Is momentum conserved?

Homework Equations


J = Δp

The Attempt at a Solution


J = Δp = pf-pi = mvf-mvi = 2kg (-4m/s -6m/s) = -20 kgm/s

I think I solved the part for the impulse correctly but needed some help with the reasoning for the second part of the question. I think that the momentum would not be conserved in this case because there is an impulse so there's a net force on the system. On the other hand the system is not defined so the momentum can be conserved if the system is considered to be both the cart and the wall, since the wall would experience an impulse from the cart. Which line of reasoning is correct?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. The system is not defined so both arguments you make are valid. Who knows what the question setter intended.
 
  • Like
Likes Nelson2436
Nelson2436 said:
On the other hand the system is not defined so the momentum can be conserved if the system is considered to be both the cart and the wall, since the wall would experience an impulse from the cart.
Okay, what is the velocity of the wall? What is the momentum of the wall?
 
  • Like
Likes Nelson2436
insightful said:
Okay, what is the velocity of the wall? What is the momentum of the wall?
The wall has no velocity and no momentum, unless the vibrations caused by the collision are considered. So does that mean that momentum is not conserved because there's an impulse?
 
Nelson2436 said:
The wall has no velocity and no momentum, unless the vibrations caused by the collision are considered. So does that mean that momentum is not conserved because there's an impulse?

To have conservation of momentum, you must take into acccount not just the wall but what it is attached to - probably the Earth.

These questions that ask whether momentum is conserved make no sense. Momentum is always conserved in a collision, as long as you consider all objects involved. It would be better to ask "discuss conservation of momentum in this case".
 
  • Like
Likes Nelson2436
PeroK said:
These questions that ask whether momentum is conserved make no sense. Momentum is always conserved in a collision, as long as you consider all objects involved. It would be better to ask "discuss conservation of momentum in this case".
I would suggest that one does not tell a teacher or professor that their question makes no sense. Many times it is the solver's job to make sense of the problem. Otherwise agree.

OP, you need to convince yourself that the momentum of the wall and therefore the Earth changes in this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Nelson2436
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top