Villa said:
U can see that in the equation u have written...the pressure energy (P) and potential energy (ro*g*h) are the same...isnt it?...really confused
I understand your confusion. No, they are not the same. However, they are closely related.
Imagine a column of water 10 meters tall open to the atmosphere. Assume zero velocity and incompressible (water is very nearly incompressible.)
With no velocity, the kinetic energy portion will drop out and leave:
P + \rho*g*h = constant
Now image two points in the water; point one at the top and point two at the bottom. You can use the reduced Bernoulli's equation to describe their relationship.
P1 + \rho*g*h1 = P2 + \rho*g*h2
For the h terms, h1 is 10m and h2 is 0m (at the bottom of the column.)
This leaves you with:
P1 + \rho*g*10 m = P2
Now, because point one is open to the atmosphere we know that P1 (the static pressure at point one) is equal to about 101 kPa (atmospheric pressure) or more usefully, zero gauge. Taking the second option (0 gauge pressure) leaves this:
\rho*g*10 m = P2
So you can see that the static pressure at the
bottom of the column is equal to the potential at the
top of the column.
For the sake of completeness:
P2 = \rho*g*10m = 1000 kg/m^3 * 9.81 m/s^2 * 10 m = 100kPa (gauge)