Incorrect Calculation of Time for Reactor Energy Phase Change

AI Thread Summary
The calculation for the time required for the reactor's energy phase change was initially set up incorrectly. The equation Q'*t = Q1 + Q2 was used, where Q' is the reactor's energy of 200,000 kJ, and Q1 and Q2 were based on half the mass of water for boiling and the total mass for heating to 100 degrees Celsius, respectively. The correct approach requires using half the mass for Q1, as only half the water is being boiled off, while Q2 should use the total mass to account for heating all the water to boiling point. This adjustment led to a more accurate calculation of the time needed for the phase change. Properly applying the mass values is crucial for accurate energy calculations in phase changes.
runningphysics
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
If 4.5×10^5kg of emergency cooling water at 10 ∘C are dumped into a malfunctioning nuclear reactor whose core is producing energy at the rate of 200 MW , and if no circulation or cooling of the water is provided, how long will it be before half the water has boiled away?
Relevant Equations
Q1=Lm
Q2=mc T
m=4.5*10^5
L=2257 kj/kg
c=4.184 kj/kg*K
I tried using the equation Q'*t= Q1+Q2. Where Q' is the energy of the reactor aka 200,000 kJ and t is the time. Take Q1 to be (1/2m*2257) and Q2 to be (1/2m*4.184*90). The 90 is the change in temperature for the phase change to occur from liquid water to gas, or boiling. Plugged everything in and got 2962.755 seconds. Convert to minutes by dividing by 60 seconds to get 49.379 minutes. This answer was wrong. Can anyone tell me what is wrong with this setup?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out. What needs to happen the mass for Q1 needs to be the total mass divided by 2. The Q2 mass needs to be the total mass. This is because 1/2 of the water is being boiled off, but the total amount of water needs to reach the 100 degrees Celsius.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and Lnewqban
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top