What Is the Voltage Across the Resistor in an LC Circuit with Given Parameters?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussed LC circuit, the parameters include an inductance of 0.360 H, a resistance of 31.0 Ω, and a battery emf of 22.0 V. The current is increasing at a rate of 7.20 A/s. To find the voltage across the resistor (Vab), Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL) can be applied, which states that the sum of potential changes around the loop should equal zero. The equation incorporates the battery voltage, the inductor's voltage (L * di/dt), and the resistor's voltage (V = IR). The correct approach involves setting up the KVL equation to solve for the unknown voltage across the resistor.
meaghan
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In the following figure(Figure 1) switch S1 is closed while switch S2 is kept open. The inductance is L = 0.360 H, the resistance is R = 31.0 Ω , and the emf of the battery is 22.0 V . At time t after S1 is closed, the current in the circuit is increasing at a rate of di/dt = 7.20 A/s.
6754630015.jpg

At this instant what is Vab, the voltage across the resistor?

Homework Equations


Emf = L * di/dt
Kirchhoff's law
V= IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to get the emf in the inductor and add it to the 22v given, but that didn't work.
should i add the current (22/31 A) to the change in current integrated? I would get 7.2t + 22/31.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write a KVL equation for the loop?
 
gneill said:
Can you write a KVL equation for the loop?
V total = 22V + (.360*7.2)
V total = E + L*di/dt
 
meaghan said:
V total = 22V + (.360*7.2)
V total = E + L*di/dt
What is V total?

The loop has three components that exhibit potential changes: The battery, the resistor, and the inductor. Your KVL equation should sum the potential changes for each component as you "walk" around the loop, and that sum should be zero. Since the potential across the resistor is the unknown that you wish to find, let it be represented by a variable.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top