Infinite square well potential suddenly moved

omyojj
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
A ptl is initially in its ground state in a box with infinite walls at x=0 and a. The wall of the box at x=a is suddenly moved to 2a.
(Energy conserved, wave fn. remains the same, basis changed)
We can calculate the probability that the ptl will be found in the ground state of the expanded box expanding initial wave fn with new basis(k= 2aPi/n )..

But..how can we find the state of the expanded box most likely to be occupied by the ptl?(By the same method?? Calculate general expression of coefficent c`_n=<ψ`_n|ψ_1> and find n such that |c`_n|^2 max? it seems hard to find n)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you already calculated the coefficients c_n? There isn't any other obvious method of finding the n for which |c_n|^2 is maximum, except than actually solving the function n->c_n, and then trying to find the maximum.

I have no idea what kind of function it is going to be, but one should check if the extension to real variables x->c(x) has the zero point of the derivative easily solvable. Then the n and n+1 for which n<x0<n+1 are only possibilities for the maximum.
 
Last edited:
sorry..I did some computation, got |c_1|=4*2^1/2/3Pi, |c_2|=2^1/2/2 and the others less than them..

so the system is most likely to be occupied by |ψ`_2> whose energy is E2`(=E1) as expected..

thx..
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top