Influence lines (structural engineering)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on drawing influence lines for a concrete highway bridge supported by columns and abutments. The user successfully derived the shear force at joint C but seeks confirmation and guidance on the axial force in column E and the bending moment over column B. A suggestion was made to include the bridge's weight in calculations and to consider different axle positions for accurate equations. The user is encouraged to develop three equations for part (i) to aid in solving the remaining parts. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of thorough analysis and detailed calculations in structural engineering.
haris89
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The concrete highway bridge show in Figure Q3a is supported on
columns at B and E, and abutments at A and F. The bridge has joints
at C and D, which can be modeled as pins. Figure Q3b shows an
idealised model of the bridge deck.
Draw influence lines for:
i) the shear force across joint C;
ii) the axial force in column E;
iii) the bending moment in the beam over column B.

I attempted part (i) and got: when x<15m shear force at C=0, when 15m<x<30m shear force at C=(30-x)/15 and finally when x>30m shear force at C=0. I assumed the moments about joints C and D will equal 0 as they are pinned. Can anyone tell me if I'm correct?

Parts (ii) and (iii) are puzzling me though.
Could anyone give me some advice/tips on how to get an expression for the axial force in column E and bending moment over column B for the influence line?

[PLAIN]http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/1899/influenceline.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Haris, I believe you need to include the weight, 100kN, in your equations. Also, for part i, you should have 3 equations, one with the front axle on the center span, one with both axles and one with only the rear axle on the center span. Once you get that you might move on to the other two. You'll have to expend some pencil lead to complete them. S
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
150
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
16K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top