Infrared Cameras Spectral Range and Derived Temperature

AI Thread Summary
Infrared cameras are limited to detecting radiation between 1 micron and 15 microns due to the sensor materials used, which aligns with Wien's law and corresponds to temperature ranges from -79°C to 89°C. This spectral range is practical for everyday objects, but it raises questions about measuring higher temperatures, such as those from flames. The limitations of infrared cameras stem from their reliance on emissivity assumptions and calibrated correlation tables for temperature estimation. Each pixel measures total infrared energy within its sensitivity range to estimate temperature. Understanding these constraints is crucial for applications requiring accurate thermal measurements.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,

I am wondering why infrared cameras can only detect radiation between 1micron to 15micron. This clearly depends on the sensor's material. Based on Wien's law, this corresponds to temperatures from -79C to 89C. Are infrared cameras only detecting within this spectral range because it corresponds to a temperature range (-79 to 89C) which is practical and typical for everyday objects? What if the temperature was higher? A flame is much hotter than 89C. Capturing radiation from this limited spectral range seem a big limitation on which temperatures we can measure.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thermal cameras don't just depend on Wien's law, the ones I'm familiar with assume an emissivity for the object (or have you define the emissivity) and then use a calibrated correlation table for total infrared energy wrt temperature. Each pixel provides an intensity (total infrared energy at that pixel, within it's wavelength sensitivity range) and then guesses at the temperature.

More reading on the topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermographic_camera
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman and anorlunda
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top