Inner product of dirac delta function

leroyjenkens
Messages
615
Reaction score
49

Homework Statement



Find the inner product of f(x) = σ(x-x0) and g(x) = cos(x)

Homework Equations



∫f(x)*g(x)dx

Limits of integration are -∞ to ∞

The Attempt at a Solution



First of all, what is the complex conjugate of σ(x-x0)? Is it just σ(x-x0)?

And I'm not sure how to multiply f(x) and g(x) together. Do I just pick out a value of x0 that will make the dirac delta disappear and be left with the cos(x0)?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is ##\sigma(x-x_0)##? Did you mean ##\delta(x-x_0)##?

If so, the problem involves nothing more than the definition of the Dirac delta distribution. So perhaps you should write down that definition here, since it seems to be missing from your "relevant equations" section.
 
strangerep said:
What is ##\sigma(x-x_0)##? Did you mean ##\delta(x-x_0)##?

If so, the problem involves nothing more than the definition of the Dirac delta distribution. So perhaps you should write down that definition here, since it seems to be missing from your "relevant equations" section.

edit: Oh, I was using sigma and I was supposed to be using delta; hence the "delta" function. They look similar.

The dirac delta function just picks out the value of x that makes x - x0 = 0, and in that case, the function equals 1.

So basically, this problem is just a normal integral, since there's no complex conjugate of the dirac delta function?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
leroyjenkens said:
The dirac delta function just picks out the value of x that makes x - x0 = 0,
That's the effect of the dirac delta when integrated against another function.
and in that case, the function equals 1.
I don't know which "function" you're referring to here, but I'm reasonably sure you still have some misconceptions about the Dirac delta (since you're still calling it a "function", or so it seems).

Take a look at the Dirac delta Wiki page. In particular the section titled "As a distribution". The distinction between "distribution" and "ordinary function" is very important for doing anything nontrivial with the Dirac delta.

So basically, this problem is just a normal integral
For simple cases, you can get away with thinking of it like that. But for less trivial stuff, you must understand the concept of "distribution" mentioned above.

there's no complex conjugate of the dirac delta function?
It's incorrect to say there's "no complex conjugate". Rather the Dirac delta is its own conjugate (like a real number).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top