Insight/Intuition into rotations in R²

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding rotation matrices in R², specifically the equations x' = x cos(θ) - y sin(θ) and y' = x sin(θ) + y cos(θ). The user seeks a visual and intuitive explanation of how the terms -y sin(θ) and x sin(θ) affect the values along the axes, questioning whether these contributions maintain the correct distance from the origin. They express frustration with algebraic proofs and prefer geometric interpretations to clarify their understanding. The conversation also touches on the relationship between the components of the rotation and the orientation in the plane, emphasizing the need for visual aids to grasp the concepts effectively. Visual explanations are essential for a better understanding of rotation matrices.
STENDEC
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I've been using rotation matrices for quite some time now without fully grasping them. Whenever I tried to develop an intuitive understanding of...<br /> x&#039; = x\cos\theta - y\sin\theta \\<br /> y&#039; = x\sin\theta + y \cos\theta<br />... I failed and gave up. I've looked at numerous online texts and videos, but following the step-by-step explanations didn't lead to me seeing the whole picture as I had hoped.

Could someone explain to me (like I'm 5 years old), why -y\sin\theta and x\sin\theta are used to affect the value along the other axis?

Looking at the following picture (pardon the quality):
drawing.png

Is the contribution of y to x and vice versa there, to ensure that P maintains the correct distance to the origin, or is that a misguided simplification of mine? The yellow line cannot be sin + cos (Pythagorean theorem) yet I may combine these two to get x&#039; and y&#039;. Do you see where my gap in understanding lies? Is there a drawing that could clarify how these terms combine to give the correct value we observe? Algebraic proofs don't work with me I'm afraid, I need a geometric/visual explanation.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The component ##\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\cos\theta\\y\cos\theta\end{smallmatrix}\right)## represents the projection of ##\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x'\\y'\end{smallmatrix}\right)## onto the original vector ##\left(\begin{smallmatrix}x\\y\end{smallmatrix}\right)##. The other component (the "rejection") should therefore have magnitude ##|\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\sin\theta|## and be orthogonal to the projection. There are two unique solutions for such a vector.

Finally, when ##\theta## is nonzero but less than a straight angle, an increase in ##y'## corresponds to a decrease in ##x'##; i.e., the x-component of the rejection should be negative. (This condition is equivalent to a choice of orientation on ##\mathbb{R}^2##.) This tells us which solution is the desired one.

As for your drawing, I don't quite understand what you mean. Could you elaborate?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top