Integral in spherical coordinates

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I recently had to do an integral like the one in the thread below:
http://math.stackexchange.com/quest...-of-radial-function-without-bessel-and-neuman
The problem I had was also evaluating the product and I am quite sure that the answer in the thread is the one I need. I just don't understand it fully. They say we fix our x-vector such that its angle with the z-axis is the same as its dot product with the other vector. But isn't x an everchanging vector? I meant we are integrating over it. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral will produce a function of vector ξ. For any given ξ, because of the spherical symmetry elsewhere, you can rotate your coordinates to align ξ with one of the axes. In this case, z was chosen.
 
Ahh I get it now. Though I don't see which other axis you could align it with? The inclination angle does not rotate around the x or y axis. The special reason we can use the z-axis is that the inclination azimuthal angle rotates around it. Do you not agree?
 
aaaa202 said:
Ahh I get it now. Though I don't see which other axis you could align it with? The inclination angle does not rotate around the x or y axis. The special reason we can use the z-axis is that the inclination azimuthal angle rotates around it. Do you not agree?

In principle you could choose the ξ direction for any of the axes, but maybe only choosing it as the z-axis makes the integral amenable.