Integral in spherical coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating an integral in spherical coordinates, particularly focusing on the implications of spherical symmetry and the alignment of vectors during integration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of fixing a vector's orientation relative to the z-axis and question the implications of integrating over a variable vector. There is discussion about the choice of axes for alignment and the significance of spherical symmetry in simplifying the integral.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying their understanding of the problem, with some expressing insights about the alignment of vectors and the role of spherical symmetry. There is an ongoing exploration of different perspectives regarding the choice of axes for the integration process.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific integral related to a thread on a different platform, which may imply constraints based on the original problem context. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the assumptions made regarding vector alignment and integration limits.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I recently had to do an integral like the one in the thread below:
http://math.stackexchange.com/quest...-of-radial-function-without-bessel-and-neuman
The problem I had was also evaluating the product and I am quite sure that the answer in the thread is the one I need. I just don't understand it fully. They say we fix our x-vector such that its angle with the z-axis is the same as its dot product with the other vector. But isn't x an everchanging vector? I meant we are integrating over it. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral will produce a function of vector ξ. For any given ξ, because of the spherical symmetry elsewhere, you can rotate your coordinates to align ξ with one of the axes. In this case, z was chosen.
 
Ahh I get it now. Though I don't see which other axis you could align it with? The inclination angle does not rotate around the x or y axis. The special reason we can use the z-axis is that the inclination azimuthal angle rotates around it. Do you not agree?
 
aaaa202 said:
Ahh I get it now. Though I don't see which other axis you could align it with? The inclination angle does not rotate around the x or y axis. The special reason we can use the z-axis is that the inclination azimuthal angle rotates around it. Do you not agree?

In principle you could choose the ξ direction for any of the axes, but maybe only choosing it as the z-axis makes the integral amenable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K