Integral of electric field of dipole moment over a sphere at r = 0

rafaelpol
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can't get to the final equality ( integral = - 4*Pi/3).

Homework Equations


<br /> \int_V \mathbf{E }dV = - \int_F \frac{_{\mathbf{p}.\mathbf{e_{r}}}}{r^2}\mathbf{e_{r}}r^{2}d\Omega = \mathbf{p}\frac{-4\pi }{3} <br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Can't find how to get -4Pi/3. In the way I am doing the r^2 would cancel out, the unit radial vectors would multiply each other to give one, and since p is the dipole moment vector and is constant in the problem (two point charges), it would get out of the integral. The integral over the solid angle d(omega) would then be equal to 4*Pi, and the answer would p*4Pi. Something is wrong here and I don't know what. Can anyone help?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rafaelpol! :smile:

(have a pi: π and an omega: Ω and an integral: ∫ and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
rafaelpol said:
… the unit radial vectors would multiply each other to give one

nooo … you can't do that :redface:

it's not er.er :wink:
 
Thanks. I've got the correct result now. However, when this result is added to the Electric field of the dipole computed by the grad of the potential, instead of adding -4*Pi/3 *delta(r) Greiner adds +4*Pi/3 *delta(r). Why, is that? It seems to be a contradiction since if you integrate over a sphere with small radius, you should get -4*Pi/3 (as given by the integral in the above post) and not 4*Pi/3.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top