Integral on the surface of a sphere - course notes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating an integral on the surface of a sphere in an electrodynamics context. The initial confusion stems from understanding the correct expression for the surface element (da) and its relationship to the radius vector (R). Participants clarify that da is parallel to R, leading to a reformulation of the integral involving spherical coordinates. The conversation progresses to integrating over the angles and simplifying the integrand, with suggestions for substitutions to facilitate the calculations. Ultimately, the focus is on achieving the correct result through careful manipulation of the integral and its components.
Dassinia
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hello,
In my electrodynamics course, there's a "maths" introduction and there's something i don't get !

Homework Statement


It says that :
the integral on the surface of a sphere is
∫1/r da = 4πr'/3 with r=|r'-R|, R the vector from the element da to the center.
r'=r'*z^


The Attempt at a Solution


For me, R=R*z^
So, |r'-R|= (r'²-R²+2r'*R)1/2
∫1/r da = ∫1/((r'²-R²+2r'*R)1/2)) da
And da= R²*cos dθ dphi z^
And then I'm stuck !
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Dassinia! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Dassinia said:
… And da= R²*cos dθ dphi z^

No, da is parallel to R, not to the constant z :wink:
 
Hum.. I really don't get it .. !
Thank you.
 
(just got up :zzz:)

da is parallel to the (outward) normal to any surface,

so it's parallel to the vector from the centre of this sphere to the surface, ie to R :wink:
 
Hi,
So, |r'-R|= (r'²-R²+2r'*R*cosθ)1/2
∫1/r da = ∫1/((r'²-R²+2r'*R*cosθ)1/2)) da
So da have a r^ , θ^ et phi^ component ?
 
Hi Dassinia! :smile:
Dassinia said:
So da have a r^ , θ^ et phi^ component ?

Yes.

That makes da horribly complicated in spherical coordinates (they really aren't designed for adding vectors in different directions :redface:).

So you'll need to split it into x y and z components, and then integrate over r θ and φ …

can you see any way of simplifying or ignoring some of the components? :wink:
 
I'd parametrize \vec{R} in spherical coordinates, because these are the natural coordinates for the sphere. The surface normal vector was completely wrong in the original posting. It's
\mathrm{d} \vec{a}= \hat{R} R^2 \sin \vartheta \mathrm{d} \vartheta \mathrm{d} \varphi
with
\hat{R}=\hat{x} \cos \varphi \sin \vartheta + \hat{y} \sin \varphi \sin \vartheta + \hat{z} \cos \vartheta.
The integration ranges are \vartheta \in (0,\pi) and \varphi \in (0,2 \pi).

Finally I'd also choose the coordinate system such that the polar axis (the z axis in the usual definition of spherical coordinates) in direction of \vec{r}' as given in the original posting. NB: You also have to rethink about the integrand again!
 
Hello,
So what I have to calculate is :
∫∫ R²*sinθ / (r'²+R²-2*r'*R*cosθ^(1/2) dθ dphi z^
Theta from 0 to pi and Pi from 0 to 2*pi and I should find the good result ? ( It's obvious that there's only the z^ component that remains )
Thanks !
 
Last edited:
Dassinia said:
( It's obvious that there's only the z^ component that remains )

correct :smile:

(though it wouldn't hurt to give a brief reason)
∫∫ R²*sinθ / (r'²+R²-2*r'*R*cosθ^(1/2) dθ dphi z^
Theta from 0 to pi and Pi from 0 to 2*pi and I should find the good result ?

(where is the component factor? :confused:)

try a reverse trig-substitution :wink:
 
  • #10
Oh yes, I forgot it !
∫∫ R²*sinθ*cosθ / (r'²+R²-2*r'*R*cosθ^(1/2) dθ dphi z^ !
I replaced sinθ*cosθ by 1/2*sin(2θ) but it doesn't help..
 
  • #11
try cosθ = x, sinθdθ = dx :smile:

(and now I'm off to bed :zzz:)
 
  • #12
Thank you and good night !
 
  • #13
Can't get to the result ! :frown:
I'm drowning under the calculations, I'm ending up with a really big result !
I give up !
 
  • #14
(just got up :zzz:)

did you try cosθ = x ?

show us how far you got :smile:
 
  • #15
Hello,
x=cosθ
dx=-sinθ dθ
cos(0)=1
cos(pi)=-1 x goes from 1 to -1

∫ -x dx / (r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x)1/2 (ignoring for the moment the factor 2π*R²)
I've tryed integration by parts
u= x
u'=1
v'= 1// (r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x)1/2
v=-(r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x)1/2/(r'*R)

u*v= (r'²+R²+2*r'*R)1/2/(r'*R)+(r'²+R²-2*r'*R)1/2/(r'*R)
-∫u'*v = ∫(r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x)1/2/(r'*R) dx = -4(r'*R)(r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x)3/2/(3*r'*R)
 
  • #16
Dassinia said:
∫ -x dx / (r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x)1/2 (ignoring for the moment the factor 2π*R²)
I've tryed integration by parts …

oooh! :cry:

try substituting r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x = y :smile:
 
  • #17
Huh ?
So it's ∫-x/(y)1/2 DX ?
 
  • #18
uhh? :confused:

why didn't you substitute all of it?​
 
  • #19
I've tryed sooo many ways, it doesn't work.
So, Thank you for your help tiny-tim !
 
  • #20
substitue all of it,

ie also the x on top and the dx …

what do you get?​
 
  • #21
You're telling me to calculate
y=r'²+R²-2*r'*R*x
dy=-2r'*R dx

∫-y/(r'²+R²-2*r'*R) *1/(y*2r'*R ) dy
∫-1/[(r'²+R²-2*r'*R)(2r'*R )] dy ?
 
  • #22
that's almost completely wrong :redface:

what happened to the square-root?

what happened to the x ?​
 
  • #23
Oh my god !
I'm sorry, I'm really heedless, I'm shocked by what I wrote ! :bugeye:
-(y-r'²-R²)/(2*r'*R)=x
-dy/(2r'*R )=dx

I replace x by -(y-r'²-R²)/(2*r'*R) and in the integral
∫(y-r'²-R²)/(2*r'*R)*1/y1/2*dy/(2r'*R )

and now ?
 
  • #24
if you'd write it out more neatly, you'd see that it's (Ay + B)/√y,

which is just A√y + b/√y, which you can easily integrate! :smile:

(goodnight! :zzz:)
 
Back
Top