Integrating an Expression with d(h³)/dt

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on integrating the expression dV/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2), which describes the change in fluid volume over time in a cone-shaped tank. The relationship between volume V and height h is established using trigonometric relations, leading to the expression (pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2). A key point is the necessity of applying the chain rule for differentiation, specifically dV/dt = dV/dh * dh/dt, to properly integrate the expression. Participants clarify that treating d(h³) as multiple integrals is incorrect, emphasizing the importance of the chain rule in this context. The integration approach is confirmed as correct with the application of these principles.
Marcos Domingues
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
I have this expression: dV/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2); it describes a variation in time of a fluid volume V in a cone-shaped tank of total volume H*pi*R²/3;

By a trigonometric relation we get V = (pi*R²/3*H²)*h³; since tan a = H/R = h/r
where: R = radius of the tank; H = height of the tank; h = variable height of the fluid; r = radius related to a specific height h

So, when we replace V, we got the general expression (pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2);

This d(h³) term is the main problem on the integration. How do I integrate this expression?

Homework Equations



(pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Maybe consider d(h³) = dh*dh*dh and solve it as multiple integrals?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcos Domingues said:
So, when we replace V, we got the general expression (pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2);
No, this wrong. You need to use the chain rule, i.e.
$$\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{dV}{dh} \frac{dh}{dt}$$,
since ##V=V(h(t))##.
 
eys_physics said:
No, this wrong. You need to use the chain rule, i.e.
$$\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{dV}{dh} \frac{dh}{dt}$$,
since ##V=V(h(t))##.

That's right. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top