Integrating to determine speed as a function of time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on integrating to determine speed as a function of time, specifically using Newton's second law, F = ma. Participants clarify the relationship between resistive force and acceleration, leading to the equation m(dv/dt) = -bv. The integration of dv/v is discussed, with the result being ln(v) - ln(vo), indicating how to express velocity in terms of time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the integration process in solving the problem. Overall, the thread provides insights into applying physics principles to analyze motion under resistive forces.
AryRezvani
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2lk90kw.jpg


Homework Equations



The above formulas

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm lost on where to start with this. The object has an intial velocity in the X direction and has the resistive force of the plontons acting upon it when it lands. What exactly is the equation located in the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi AryRezvani! :smile:
AryRezvani said:
What exactly is the equation located in the problem?

That's good ol' Newton's second law, F = ma

F = -bv, ma = mdv/dt, so mdv/dt = bv, so dv/v = -b/m dt :wink:

(the "m =" appears to be a misprint)
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi AryRezvani! :smile:That's good ol' Newton's second law, F = ma

F = -bv, ma = mdv/dt, so mdv/dt = bv, so dv/v = -b/m dt :wink:

(the "m =" appears to be a misprint)

Thanks for the response Tiny-Tim :)

Okay, so i follow you somewhat. F = -bv (general formula for resistive force).

According to Newton's second law, F=ma which can be rewritten as F=m(dv/dt).

You then equate those two, and you get m(dv/dt)=-bv.

What happens after this? (dv/v) is the derivative of velocity with respect to velocity? :eek:
 
AryRezvani said:
(dv/v) is the derivative of velocity with respect to velocity? :eek:

ah, no …

∫ dv/v is a short way of writing ∫ (1/v) dv …

just integrate it! :smile:
 
Ohh so when you integrate that you get ln(v)?
 
AryRezvani said:
Ohh so when you integrate that you get ln(v)?

yes! :smile:

(to be precise, ln(v) - ln(vo))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top