Integrating (using partial fractions) Apostol Section 6.25 #25

process91
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\int\frac{4x^5-1}{(x^5+x+1)^2}dx


Homework Equations


This is in the section on Partial Fractions. The main idea in this section was that you get the integral down to a sum integrals of the following forms:
\int\frac{dx}{(x+a)^n} , \int \frac{x dx}{(x^2 + bx + c)^m} , \int \frac{dx}{(x^2+bx+c)^m}


The Attempt at a Solution


The basic approach for most of these was to just use partial fractions by factoring the denominator and algebraically breaking down the result. I factored the denominator to

\left(x^2+x+1\right)^2\left(x^3-x^2+1\right)^2

The term on the right could be factored again, but it doesn't look promising.


I sense I should be using a different approach with this problem, but I'm not sure what.

Please just give me a hint, if possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uuh, here's a way to solve it without using partial fractions. Try to write
\frac{4x^5-1}{(x^5+x+1)^2}

in the form of

\frac{f^\prime g-g^\prime f}{g^2}

Try to determine f here.


But how to do it with partial fractions?? Well, the only way I see is to write

x^3-x^2+1=(x+\alpha)(x^2-\frac{x}{\alpha^2}+\frac{1}{\alpha})

and proceed formally. The hope is that the \alpha will cancel itself in the end (which it will here). But this is likely to become very difficult.
 
The quotient rule idea is what I came to after seeing the answer, and after I saw it I couldn't un-see it. Many of the other problems in this section have been extremely cumbersome arithmetically for me, so it's very possible that the \alpha method would be what Apostol had in mind.
 
micromass said:
Uuh, here's a way to solve it without using partial fractions. Try to write
\frac{4x^5-1}{(x^5+x+1)^2}

in the form of

\frac{f^\prime g-g^\prime f}{g^2}

Try to determine f here.
...
It makes sense to assume that f(x) is a polynomial & of course g(x) = x5 + x + 1. After some consideration you can convince yourself that f(x) is of the form, f(x) = ax + b.

WolframAlpha gets the surprisingly uncomplicated answer, but I couldn't get it to show the steps.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top