Integration of wave functions problem.

In summary, the individual is self-taught in advanced physics and multivariable calculus, but may not be completely informed on all topics. They need help with a problem involving improper integrals and are curious about the correct method for solving it. They consulted a table of integrals and tried using integration by parts, but ended up with incorrect coefficients. After reviewing their work, they were able to solve the problem correctly and obtain the correct coefficients.
  • #1
infinitylord
34
1
Note: I am completely self taught. I have only gone as far as Algebra and regular physics in high school. But I took the initiative to teach myself advanced physics and up to multivariable calculus from reading a book on the subject. So I may not be completely informed on everything present. I just need help with my work. Thank you! I'm also not sure how to make the icons appear as though they are over the other.

Okay, I was given a problem and I got through most of it. But there is one part where I'm not completely sure how to do the integration.

2[itex]\int^∞_0[/itex][itex]e^{-3r/2a_0}[/itex][itex]r^2[/itex]dr + λ[itex]\int^∞_0[/itex][itex]e^{-3r/2a_0}[/itex][itex]r^3[/itex]dr=0

I did solve the problem in the end (solving for λ) in a very unorthodox way. But I am curious as to how it should be solved. I consulted a table of integrals and gave a shot at the improper integrals. But ended up with the wrong coefficients but everything else right. I'm curious as to why my coefficients were wrong. In this specific problem, the coefficients are infact negligible, so, again, I got the answer correct. But I would at least like to have the knowledge to do it correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If your constant [itex]a_0[/itex] is positive, then indeed, those improper integrals converge. What you want is a technique referred to as Integration by Parts. This will allow you to find antiderivatives of functions of the form [itex]f(r)=r^n e^{-cr}[/itex] among others, where [itex]c[/itex] is a positive constant (so in your case, [itex]c=\frac{3}{2a_0}[/itex]).

Integration by parts is essentially the product rule backwards. Typically this is one of the first techniques taught when beginning integral calculus. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_by_parts.

Give it a try, and tell me where your coefficients go wrong. Show your work too, please.
 
  • #3
infinitylord said:
Note: I am completely self taught. I have only gone as far as Algebra and regular physics in high school. But I took the initiative to teach myself advanced physics and up to multivariable calculus from reading a book on the subject. So I may not be completely informed on everything present. I just need help with my work. Thank you! I'm also not sure how to make the icons appear as though they are over the other.

Okay, I was given a problem and I got through most of it. But there is one part where I'm not completely sure how to do the integration.

2[itex]\int^∞_0[/itex][itex]e^{-3r/2a_0}[/itex][itex]r^2[/itex]dr + λ[itex]\int^∞_0[/itex][itex]e^{-3r/2a_0}[/itex][itex]r^3[/itex]dr=0

I did solve the problem in the end (solving for λ) in a very unorthodox way. But I am curious as to how it should be solved. I consulted a table of integrals and gave a shot at the improper integrals. But ended up with the wrong coefficients but everything else right. I'm curious as to why my coefficients were wrong. In this specific problem, the coefficients are infact negligible, so, again, I got the answer correct. But I would at least like to have the knowledge to do it correctly.

I would use integration by parts on each integral. For the first integral, u = r2 and dv = e-3r/(2a0dr. That would yield an integral where r's exponent is 1. I would then use int. by parts one more time, using almost the same substitutions.

For the other integral I would do almost the same, starting with u = r3. You would need to do integration by parts two more times.

LaTeX tip: Use one pair of tex or itex tags for the whole expression or equation, rather than a whole bunch of pairs of tags.

This site also takes ## for itex and $$ for tex.
 
  • #4
I am familiar with integration by parts. And I did try to use it when I tried to solved originally. Would I have a formula at the end similar to: ?

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]x^n[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]dx = (1/a)[itex]x^n[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]-(n/a)[itex]\int[/itex][itex]x^{n-1}[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]dx
 
Last edited:
  • #5
infinitylord said:
I am familiar with integration by parts. And I did try to use it when I tried to solved originally. Would I have a formula at the end similar to: ?

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]x^n[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]dx = (1/a)[itex]x^n[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]-(n/a)[itex]\int[/itex][itex]x^{n-1}[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]dx
Not at the end, but at each step along the way. At each step I described you reduce the exponent on xn by 1.
 
  • #6
infinitylord said:
I am familiar with integration by parts. And I did try to use it when I tried to solved originally. Would I have a formula at the end similar to: ?

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]x^n[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]dx = (1/a)[itex]x^n[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]-(n/a)[itex]\int[/itex][itex]x^{n-1}[/itex][itex]e^{ax}[/itex]dx

As already mentioned, you need only a single pair of itex tags. Click the Quote button to see what I did.

##\int x^n e^{ax}dx = (1/a) x^n e^{ax}-(n/a)\int x^{n-1}e^{ax}dx ##
 
  • #7
I can't seem to get it. I wrote down my work, so here's a picture. If you can help me I'd greatly appreciate it. This is only the first integral, obviously. It's supposed to equal [itex]16a^3_0/27[/itex]Edit: I forgot the "2" in front of the integral. And this is only the first integral, obviously. It's supposed to equal [itex]16a^3_0/27[/itex]
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0368.jpg
    IMAG0368.jpg
    14.2 KB · Views: 392
Last edited:
  • #8
You can check your work, you know. Take the derivative of what you have, and you should get your integrand. It's always a good idea to do this.

As a very simple example of this,
$$\int x^2dx = (1/3)x^3 + C$$

To check, d/dx( (1/3)x3 + C) = 3 * (1/3)x2 + 0 = x2. That's the integrand in the original problem, so my answer checks.
 
  • #9
When I factor a little further and then use the limits of the improper integral I get [itex]32a^3_0/27[/itex]... which is the correct answer! So in this case, I got the correct coefficients too. Thank you!
 

1. What is the purpose of integrating wave functions?

The purpose of integrating wave functions is to find the total probability of a particle's position in a given region of space. This is done by taking the square of the wave function and integrating it over that region.

2. How is integration of wave functions related to quantum mechanics?

Integration of wave functions is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics, as it allows us to calculate the probability of finding a particle in a specific location. This is a key aspect of understanding the behavior of quantum systems.

3. What are the steps involved in integrating wave functions?

The steps involved in integrating wave functions include setting up the integral, determining the limits of integration, solving the integral using appropriate techniques, and interpreting the result in terms of probability.

4. Can integration of wave functions be applied to all quantum systems?

Yes, integration of wave functions can be applied to all quantum systems, as long as the system is described by a wave function that is square-integrable (meaning it has a finite integral over all space).

5. Can integration of wave functions be used to calculate other properties besides position?

Yes, integration of wave functions can also be used to calculate other properties of a quantum system, such as momentum or energy. This is done by integrating the corresponding operators with the wave function.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
366
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
842
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
364
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
946
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
528
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
391
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
900
Back
Top