Integration problem am I correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter badgermanb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
badgermanb
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Integrate: \int2x*ex2dx


Homework Equations


\inteudu = eu

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried integration by substitution:
Let u=x2
Then du=2x*dx

So then it is:
\inteu*du

Which would give me:
eu+c

So subbing x2 back in for u:
ex2+c

I looked this type of function up online and got a lot of complicated results involving square root of pi or a log function and things referring to an error formula integral or something? :confused: ... so I was just double checking to see if this seemingly simple solution works. And maybe someone could explain what I was seeing online? Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first you forgot the dx in the original expression.

Your work and answer looks right to me. I wouldn't look online for ways to do things or answers because you usually will either find incorrect things or stuff that isn't at your level yet.
 
And, badgermanb, remember you can always differentiate your answer to check it is a correct anti-derivative.
 
Thanks, yeah I remember that now. Worked it out back and forth now. Thanks for the help! It's been a while since I did calc out like this so I keep forgetting my little tips and tricks.
 
Also, badgerman, what you solved (the integral of 2x*e^(x^2)) and what you looked up online (the integral of e^(-x^2)) are different functions and that's why what you looked up was strange. I'm guessing it was something like this?

\integral e^{-x^2} dx = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2} erf(x) + C

That's the integral of a different, albeit similar function. Just to clear up what you DID see.
 
Yeah I noticed the negative sign when I was googling it. Amazing how a single negative can change it so much. I think also a lot of the confusion arose from finding a definite as opposed to indefinite integral, in terms of an exact numerical solution. Either way, it's all coming back to me now... once again, thanks for the help :)
 
No it is not the negative sign that makes the difference, but the x in front of e^x^2. As you can see by differentiation e^x^2 we obtain 2xe^x^2. There is however no 'standard' function that when differentiated gives e^x^2.
 
That makes sense. A lot, actually. lol
 

Similar threads

Back
Top