Intensity of light after passing thru polaroid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of light intensity after passing through two polaroids, with one being rotated. The initial assumption is that the light is unpolarized when passing through the first polaroid, resulting in an intensity of 0.5 times the initial intensity. The confusion arises regarding the interpretation of the problem, particularly whether "initial intensity" refers to before the second polarizer or before both. The calculated angle of 35.3° differs from the book's answer of 54.7°, highlighting the importance of precise problem phrasing. Clarification on the nature of the initial light (polarized or unpolarized) is crucial for accurate calculations.
somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two pieces of polaroid are arranged so they are initially parallel . One of the polaroid is rotated until the intensity of the light beam from the two polaroid is 1/3 of its initial intensity . Calculate the angle turned thru the polaroid


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i assume it's a non-polarised passing thru the first polaroid , then the second polaroid is rotated.
so i have Intensity after passing thru 1st polaroid (I 1 ) = 0.5 intensity of non-polarised (I 0)...
for light ray emerging from second polaroid = (I 2 ) = 0.5(I 0) ( (cos θ )^2) .finally i found out my θ = 35.3° the ans form the book is 54.7°

why i am wrong?
the initial light ray is polarised or non- polarised? how to determine it? it's not stated in the question...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
somecelxis said:

Homework Statement


Two pieces of polaroid are arranged so they are initially parallel . One of the polaroid is rotated until the intensity of the light beam from the two polaroid is 1/3 of its initial intensity . Calculate the angle turned thru the polaroid


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i assume it's a non-polarised passing thru the first polaroid , then the second polaroid is rotated.
so i have Intensity after passing thru 1st polaroid (I 1 ) = 0.5 intensity of non-polarised (I 0)...
for light ray emerging from second polaroid = (I 2 ) = 0.5(I 0) ( (cos θ )^2) .finally i found out my θ = 35.3° the ans form the book is 54.7°

why i am wrong?
the initial light ray is polarised or non- polarised? how to determine it? it's not stated in the question...

It sounds like they did not phrase the problem correctly. With the precise phrasing you wrote, you are correct (assuming initial unpolarized light). But if interpret the question as meaning: at what angle is the intensity equal to 1/3 it was before entering the second polarizer (in other words, by "initial" we mean before the second polarizer, not before the two polarizers) then we get the answer they give.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top