Interference of circularly polarized waves

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Two (left) circularly polarized monochromatic plane waves S2 and S3 arrive at the xy plane with an incidence angle θ (see figure). Find the intensity of the light projected in the xy plane.
a2dl74_th.png

(Nevermind S1, it is only mentioned in another part of the problem)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I've written down the expression for a monochromatic plane wave circularly polarized using $$\vec e_1 = sinθ\vec i + cos θ \vec j $$ $$\vec e_2 = \vec j$$ as the basis for the polarization vector for S2 and $$\vec e_1 = -sinθ\vec i + cosθ \vec j $$ $$\vec e_2 = \vec j$$ for S3. Then the electromagnetic vector at the xy plane its just the sum of them both.

Now the intensity would be $$ I = \frac{εc} {n} \langle \vec E_r^2 \rangle = \frac{εc} {c} \vec E · \vec E^* = \frac{εc} {c} (\vec E_1 + \vec E_2)·(\vec E_1^* + \vec E_2 ^*)$$, but to get to this point every source I've found has assumed that both waves are linearly polarized, so I'm not sure if it would be the same with other polarizations. I don't see why not, but I would like to confirm it before going on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all for circular polarization, the TE and TM components of the light are dephased by 900, which doesn't seem to manifest in your expression for the unit vectors. Second, since the incoming beams are not parallel to the z axis, therefore you must expect that the E field has a component along the z-direction.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top