Interference of Xrays from a salt crystal

user3
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In my textbook(Serway), Constructive interference of two rays hitting the first and the second planes , respectively, of a crystal lattice is derived as 2dsin(Θ)=mλ , where Θ is the angle shown in the picture.

My question is: shouldn't the equation be 2dsin(Θ) = (m+1/2 )λ instead? because the salt crystal is a "heavier" (larger refractive index) medium than air, so the first ray exhibits a 180 degrees phase shift.




braggslaw.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi user3. Welcome to PF!

Here's one way to think about it. In x-ray diffraction you are considering reflection from successive planes in a family of planes which are oriented in the same way. How would you expect the lattice planes in the family to compare with one another in their reflective properties. In particular, if there is a phase shift of ø when the radiation reflects off one of the planes, what would you expect the phase shift to be when the radiation reflects off other planes in the family?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I got it! Thank you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top