Mastering Integration by Parts: Tips and Tricks for Solving Difficult Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intergration parts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a challenging integration problem that a user is seeking help with. Participants suggest using the integration by parts formula, specifically the version that utilizes u and v instead of f(x) and g(x). One user recommends rewriting the integral as sec^(n-2)x*sec^2xdx to simplify the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in notation when applying integration techniques. Overall, the thread provides practical advice for tackling difficult integration problems using established methods.
Spectre32
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on this one problem. If anyone can aid me, I would greatly appericate it.


http://home.comcast.net/~personalcomp1/Impossible_calc_problem.JPG

I scaned in the problem sooo there's the place to view it.



Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
you can write it as sec^(n-2)x*sec^2xdx and see where that takes you.
 
Roger that.. i'll do that and see where that takes me.
 
Here's the neater version (avoid the f(x) and g(x)'s when solving problems) of the integration by parts rule:

<br /> \int u dv = uv - \int v du<br />

Now follow Parth Dave's advice. I mentioned this as some old books still use f(x) and g(x) instead of the neater looking u and v. (Oh well, you might use f and g instead of u and v ;-))

Cheers
Vivek
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top