What values of WT should I use for internal radiation dose calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter adamworth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Internal Radiation
AI Thread Summary
For internal radiation dose calculations, the discussion centers on the appropriate weighting factors (WT) to use for different types of radiation exposure. The participant is uncertain whether to use WT = 1 for neutron exposure and ingested isotopes like 90Sr and 131I, or if lower values should be applied for ingested materials, specifically WT = 0.12 for stomach and WT = 0.04 for thyroid. Clarification is sought on the necessity of using WT in conjunction with dose conversion factors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately determining effective dose calculations based on the type of radiation and exposure method. Accurate selection of WT values is crucial for proper internal dose assessment.
adamworth
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question attached.

I want to check what values of WT I should use.

Homework Equations



Effective dose = WT*WR*WT,R

The Attempt at a Solution



For the neutron whole-body dose I have WT = 1.

For the ingested 90Sr and 131I, I also have WT = 1. Are these correct or does "ingested" mean I should take a value of WT = 0.12 (stomach), or should I use WT = 0.04 (thyroid)?

Thank you for any help
 

Attachments

  • Question 8.jpg
    Question 8.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 374
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
First you must calculate the effective dose du to neutrons with Wr, second calculate the effective dose du to ingestion of Sr (with dose intake conversion factor)
 
Hi, yes I've done that, I need to know what values of WT to use. But actually you said I don't need to use WT as I used a coefficient. I will send you my answer by pm.
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Background radiation sources question
Replies
4
Views
2K
Calculating Amplitude in Simple Harmonic Motion
Replies
1
Views
2K
What is the radiation weight factor?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Equation to calculate absorbed dose of radiation?
Replies
3
Views
3K
How Do You Calculate Radiation Dose Through Lead Shielding?
Replies
29
Views
3K
Calculating magnetic induction in a triangle
Replies
8
Views
2K
What is the maximum value of the current through the inductor?
Replies
34
Views
7K
Calculating Amplitude and Velocity of Mechanical Waves in Non-Uniform Wire
Replies
5
Views
2K
Solving the Question: Calculating Dose Rate for 90Sr
Replies
6
Views
1K
How Do I Calculate Fluence, Flux, and Dose for a TiH Beam?
Replies
26
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top