Inverse Laplace Transform, can't use partial fractions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the inverse Laplace transform of a second-order differential equation, specifically 3y''(t) + 2y'(t) + 5y(t) = 3, with initial conditions y'(0) = 1 and y(0) = 0. The user expresses difficulty in applying partial fractions due to the quadratic 3s² + 2s + 5 having complex roots. A suggestion is made to use the roots to express the inverse transform, highlighting that the roots are complex and can be utilized in the transformation process. The solution involves recognizing the form of the quadratic and applying the inverse Laplace transform accordingly. This method allows for the calculation of the inverse transform despite the initial concerns about partial fractions.
_diego
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first post, and I'm not sure if I'm posting this in the right place.

Homework Statement



I have a 2nd order diff. equation:
3y''(t) + 2y'(t) + 5y(t) = 3
with initial values: y'(0) = 1, y(0) = 0


Homework Equations


After using Laplace transform I get:

Y(s) = (3 + 3s) / (s*[3s2 +2s +5])

I believe it is correct, but even if it's not, what I'm interested in is how to solve this particular inverse laplace transform where I can't use partial fractions due to 3s2 +2s +5 not having any roots.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm kind of stuck here, but maybe I could split the fraction like:

Y(s) = 3 / (s*[3s2 +2s +5]) + 3 / ([3s2 +2s +5])

but the problem would remain.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could split it as

A/s + (Bs + C)/(3s2 + 2s + 5)
 
I would us an online solver such as WolframAlpha type in:

DSolve[{3y''[t]+2y'[t]+5y[t]==3,y'[0]==1,y[0]==0},y[t],t] and enter
 
Re-reading my post I think I didn't explain my problem correctly. My problem is in calculating the inverse transform of such rational function.
I could split it like that, but then I would have no idea on how to solve:
L-1[ (Bs + C)/(3s2 + 2s + 5) ]

Since I'm studying for a final exam, I really can't use a solver, but thanks.
 
Thanks for the clarification. Looking at the WolframAlpha solution can still be helpful. Their solution looks very similar to a homogeneous second order diff. eqn with complex roots. Might be a place to start.
 
_diego said:
Hi, this is my first post, and I'm not sure if I'm posting this in the right place.

Homework Statement



I have a 2nd order diff. equation:
3y''(t) + 2y'(t) + 5y(t) = 3
with initial values: y'(0) = 1, y(0) = 0


Homework Equations


After using Laplace transform I get:

Y(s) = (3 + 3s) / (s*[3s2 +2s +5])

I believe it is correct, but even if it's not, what I'm interested in is how to solve this particular inverse laplace transform where I can't use partial fractions due to 3s2 +2s +5 not having any roots.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm kind of stuck here, but maybe I could split the fraction like:

Y(s) = 3 / (s*[3s2 +2s +5]) + 3 / ([3s2 +2s +5])

but the problem would remain.

Thanks

Of course you can use partial fractions. The function 3s^2 + 2s + 5 has the form 3*(s-r1)*(s-r2), where r1 and r2 are the two roots of the quadratic; they are complex: r1 = -(1/3) + (1/3)*sqrt(14)*I and r2 = -(1/3) - (1/3)*sqrt(14)*I, where I = sqrt(-1). Then 1/[(s-r1)(s-r2)] = [1/(s-r1) - 1/(s-r2)]/(r1 - r2). The inverse Laplace transform of 1/(3s^2+2s+5) is [(1/3)/(r1-r2)]*[exp(r1*t) - exp(r2*t)] = (1/3)*exp(-t/3)*[(2i)sin(w*t)]/(2i*sqrt(14)/3) = (3/14)*exp(-t/3)*sin(wt), where w = sqrt(14)/3.

R.G. Vickson
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top