A Ionization Rate for Cosmic Rays, given the CR spectrum

unicornflyers
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all, so I am working on a presentation. What I have done so far was to calculate the cosmic ray spectrum (so given some data from Voyager 1 and PAMELA, I found the intensity as a function of the energy, in units of m^-2 (sr s MeV)^-1.

Given this function, which is essentially J = constant*E^d[(E^k+const)/(const)]^(const)

This was done for 3 species, including helium, electrons, and protons (so the function is similar but different for all 3).

note: d, k are also constants. These were figured out in Matlab using least squares regression, but my question isn't related to this, so I didn't feel it necessary to include the entire equation typed out. If needed, I can include this.

Next, I found the energy density (aka kinetic energy density) by integrating this intensity over a solid angle. So in essence, integrate the above function J, and that'll be times the constant 4pi which comes out of the solid angle.I assumed the arrival of cosmic rays to be isotropic.

Great. So now I need to find the ionization rate. And I have no idea how to do this. So given some cosmic ray spectrum that has J proportional to some value of E, and/or given the energy density (by integrating the spectrum), how on Earth do I go about finding the ionization rate?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are formulas for the ionization rate as function of the energy. For an isolated piece of material in free space, you can multiply the flux by the ionization rate, then integrate over the energy. Realistically, your satellite will provide shielding against low-energetic particles from some sides, and produce showers out of high-energetic particles. A proper analysis will need some finite element simulation of the propagation of cosmic rays of different energies from different direction.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top