Is a Matching Circuit Needed Between an Antenna and Signal Generator?

AI Thread Summary
A matching circuit may not be necessary if the commercially available inductive loop antennas are specified as having a 50 Ohm input impedance, as manufacturers typically integrate a balun network for compatibility. When connecting a signal generator to these antennas, it's important to ensure that both the source and load maintain a 50 Ohm impedance. The efficiency of the loop antenna can be affected if it is not a full wavelength in diameter, but this may not be critical for short-range applications like RFID. Additionally, using a lower frequency to stimulate the loop could minimize issues with test leads and capacitance, potentially achieving the desired results without directly using the resonant frequency. Overall, understanding the impedance and configuration is key to successful testing.
temujin
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have a few 50 ohm loop antennas tuned to resonate at 13.56 MHz. (inductive RFID antenna). I would like to test one antenna´s influence on the other, so I think one approach is to connect one antenna directly to a signal generator.
Do I have to design any matching circuit between the antenna and the signal generator?

any help is appreciated

regards
donEirik
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How did you make a 50 Ohm loop antenna? My Stutzman and Theile book on Antennas says, "The input resistance for a one-wavelength perimeter [loop antenna] is about 100 Ohms. Other perimeter values give rather awkward input impedances." The only places where the input impedance of the loop antenna is real looks to be around 1.1 wavelength and 1.5 wavelength (for 100 Ohms and about 1.5kOhms respectively).

Also, the loop antenna has a balanced input impedance (the two conductors at the input are symmetrical), so when you go from the unbalanced (single-ended) output of the signal generator into the loop antenna, you need to use a balun to do the conversion. So assuming that your loops are full-wave loops, you will need a balun to do the 50 Ohm single-ended to 100 Ohm differential conversion when going from your signal generator to the antenna. You'll also need the same type of balun when going from your 2nd loop antenna into your 50 Ohm spectrum analyzer or other 50 Ohm receiver.

Hope that helps. You can look up baluns and how to make them in the ARRL Handbook or other antenna/RF books. -Mike-
 
hi and thanks,

Does it make a difference that I work with inductive loops only? (I´m only interested in the magnetic field produced by the loop)
I didn´t make the loop myself...as far as I know, most commercially available inductive antennas for RFID are 50 ohm antennas. And I don´t know if the relation to the wavelength matters for those antennas either, as I work with antennas between 1 - 20 cm in diameter which is only a fraction of the wavelength of 3.53 m at 13.56 MHz.
Do you still think I need to use a balun?

t.
 
Well if they're listed as having a 50 Ohm input impedance at their operating frequency, then the manufacturers must be adding a balun network to the input of the "antennas". As long as you connect 50 Ohm sources (sig gen) and loads (spectrum analyzer), then you should be okay. When the loop isn't a full wave in diameter, it won't be very efficient for transmit or receive, but if the application is short range in nature, like some RFID applications, then that won't matter.
 
I hope you don't mind me asking if you are trying to pump in a signal at the actual frequency (13.5Mhz) which seems unecessary, since it was designed to resonate at that frequency. i.e., why not pump in any lower frequency in which 13.5 Mhz would be a strong harmonic.
The reason I'm asking is because the test leads and lines would seem to need to be extremely short and very low capacitance so as not to influence your experiment, and I am thinking this might not be a problem if you could use a lower frequency and get the same result (stimulation at the desired frequency).
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top