Is Internal Energy Always Proportional to Temperature?

AI Thread Summary
Internal energy is related to temperature, but they are not always directly proportional, especially during phase changes. In isothermal conditions, internal energy remains constant despite temperature changes. The process of changing states, such as melting ice to water, requires energy that does not contribute to temperature increase. Therefore, when calculating energy for heating and phase changes, all energy contributions must be considered. Understanding these distinctions clarifies why internal energy and temperature do not always align.
jack1234
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
Internal energy vs temperature(q37)

For this question:
http://tinyurl.com/3ymlnj

The answer to this question is c.

But according to my understanding, increasing of internal energy means increasing of temperature. Hence is isothermal situation, the change of internal energy is 0.
With this understanding, if c is the answer, b will be the answer.

But now b is not the answer, hence I wish to know is there anything wrong with this understanding?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
conversion of state (for example: from a solid to a liquid) costs energy, and while the energy is going into converting the state of the matter, it doesn't go into raising the temperature of it.

So when we find out how much energy it takes to make -5 degree ice into 7 degrees water, we have to add together:

1) the energy it takes to raise it from -5 to 0 degrees C
2) the energy it takes to convert it from ice to water
3) the energy it takes to raise it from 0 to 7 degrees C

so when matter is at its melting or boiling points (it's temperature of phase change) it can exist in both phases with that same temperature. Ice and water can both exist at 0 degrees C (32 F)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top