Is Mechanical Energy Conserved in Rolling Motion without Slipping?

AI Thread Summary
In rolling motion without slipping, mechanical energy is not conserved due to the work done by friction, which creates torque about the axis of rotation. The point of contact does not experience displacement, meaning friction does not do work on the system. The distinction between 'rolling' and 'rotating' about the instantaneous axis of rotation is questioned, highlighting the nuances in these concepts. The discussion also clarifies that no external force does work about the instantaneous axis of rotation. Overall, the mechanics of rolling motion involve complex interactions between friction and torque.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attachment.php?attachmentid=33070&stc=1&d=1300105809.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution



In rolling without slipping, the friction does some work of torque about the axis of rotation. So mechanical energy is not conserved. A) - r),t)

B) and C) - r),t)

D) - One example I can think for the instant centre of rotation is the point of contact of a wheel rolling without slipping on a surface. No other force acts about the point of rotation.
So p),q),s) are the options here.

btw is there any difference between 'rolling' and 'rotating' about instantaneous axis of rotation?

answer for A) is incorrect.
 

Attachments

  • matrix.jpg
    matrix.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 427
Physics news on Phys.org
Abdul Quadeer said:
In rolling without slipping, the friction does some work of torque about the axis of rotation. So mechanical energy is not conserved. A) - r),t)
Just because friction provides a torque about the center of mass does not mean it does work on the system. There is no displacement of the point of contact.
 
Thanks! I got it now.
But I still have a problem. Is my explanation for D) correct? Is it true that no external force does work about the instantaneous axis of rotation?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top