Is My Approach to Solving the Inertia Tensor of a Rotating Cone Correct?

Saxonphone
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From Goldstein's Classical Mechanics (Chapter 5 - Exercice 17 - Third Edition)
A uniform right circular cone of height h, half angle A, and density B rolls on its side without slipping on a uniform horizontal plane in such a manner that it returns to its original position in a time t. Find expressions for the kinetic energy and the components of the angular momentum of the cone.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, first of all, I found the inertia tensor for a cone with the z axis along the axis of symmetry of the cone and the origin at his apex, then I made it "rotate" (90-A) degrees to put the x-axis in the line of the cone's surface that is always in contact with the plane (a drawing would be good I know, but...)

The tensor is diagonal and what i found was
a.jpg


As the angular velocity w( vector) always lies in that line, so one can say w (vector) = w(cosA k - sinA i) where w is the modulus of the vector and i and k the unit vectors of x and z.
w can be found with the data provided and is given by
b.jpg


Knowing all this, all I have to do is put what I got in L (vector)= I (tensor) w (vector) and T=1/2 I w^2.

The book got no anwers, so, anything wrong with what i did?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I realize this is an old thread, but I'm working on this problem and am in a similar place as Saxonphone was. Does this look correct, so far?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top