Is my forces diagram correct? (static equilibrium problem)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagram Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force R acting on a crane's axis while lifting a 500 kg mass at a constant speed, with the cable inclined at 45 degrees. The original poster seeks validation for their force diagram and expresses frustration with the complexity of solving the problem using the law of sines and force summation. Participants suggest focusing on a free body diagram of the pulley and using Newton's laws to determine the components of the force. The poster makes progress but still struggles with numerical accuracy, attributing some errors to calculator mistakes. Overall, the conversation highlights collaborative problem-solving in static equilibrium scenarios.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
(static equilibrium problem)

Homework Statement




Calculate the force R that acts on the axis of the crane (O), if the crane lifts in a constant speed a mass of 500 kg. The incline angle of the cable to the horizontal line is 45 degrees. Do not consider pulley friction.

The answers are:

R = 9063.23 [N]
Beta = 67.5 degrees

[PLAIN]http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/2276/forcesquest.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution



I've only made a force diagram to ask you guys whether it's correct.

[PLAIN]http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/7528/forces.jpg


*sighs* Truth is playing with triangles, law of Sines, and sum of all forces on X and Y is getting me nowhere -- but is this the way to solve it? I think that if my force diagram is correct it should be easy...just too many unknowns...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are doing more work than necessary...the OP just wants the force applied at O, so draw a FBD of the pulley, note the tension in the rope, and use Newton 1 in the x and y directions to solve for Rx and Ry...and Pythagorus to solve for R. The direction of R must be along the bisector of the angle between the ropes.
 
Well, I've taken your advice and I'm inching close to the answer in terms of the numerical result but still a bit off... it seems to make since though... (angle is a piece of cake once I have the correct Rx and Ry...clear I don't yet)

I attached the file of my new diagram and method to solve it...do you mind taking a look?
 

Attachments

  • 600pf.jpg
    600pf.jpg
    36.8 KB · Views: 563
Dory said:
Well, I've taken your advice and I'm inching close to the answer in terms of the numerical result but still a bit off... it seems to make since though... (angle is a piece of cake once I have the correct Rx and Ry...clear I don't yet)

I attached the file of my new diagram and method to solve it...do you mind taking a look?
Again your equations are good but your math is lousy :wink:. Add up mg and Tsin45 again...
 
Ah...it's that stupid calculator *embarrassed grin*...thanks a lot phantom :D What'd I do without you!
 
Dory said:
Ah...it's that stupid calculator *embarrassed grin*...thanks a lot phantom :D What'd I do without you!
Well,without me, you can always count on nvn or tiny-tim...and a host of others...:wink:
 
Hehe... I love this forum. Best stuff on the internet!
 
Back
Top