Is my method for solving the GRE Relativity Problem correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gre Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the method used to solve a GRE relativity problem involving the rest energies of particles. The original approach involved calculating the total rest energy and using it to find momentum and velocity, but the participant acknowledges that this method is inefficient under exam conditions. They also explore the relationship between rest energy and total energy to derive the Lorentz factor (γ) and its implications for velocity (β). Ultimately, while the method may yield a correct answer, it is deemed impractical for the GRE's time constraints. The conversation emphasizes the importance of efficient problem-solving techniques in physics exams.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


http://grephysics.net/ans/8677/20

So to do this, I solved for the total rest energy of both particles.
The rest energy of Kaon + K = Rest energy of Proton
Rest energy of Proton - Rest Energy of Kaon = K
K = P^2/2m
((Rest Energy of Proton - Rest Energy of Kaon)*(2*Mass of Kaon))^1/2 = P

P = mv/(sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

If I do this and do all the algebra correct and solve for v, will this method give me the correct answer? I got the wrong answer but I suck at numbers X_x.

I realize after looking at the answers on the website this is a poor way to do this problem with GRE time constraints, I just want to know if this thought process is flawed or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the rest energy of a particle is 494 MeV, and its total energy is 938 MeV, what is γ? Since γ=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}, square both sides and solve for β2 in terms of γ2. What is the value of β?
 
Yeah, I see that this is the best way to do it. I was just wondering if my way works (even though it would take way longer).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top