Is My Physics Teacher's Explanation of Dropping Magnets Through Pipes Accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miracles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnets Pipes
AI Thread Summary
The explanation provided by the physics teacher about dropping a magnet through a tube is accurate and aligns with Lenz's law. As the magnet falls, it creates a changing magnetic field that induces an electric current in the tube, resulting in magnetic fields that oppose the magnet's motion. At different positions, the direction of the induced current changes, with counterclockwise currents at position A and clockwise currents at position B, reflecting the magnet's movement. The strength of the induced currents increases with the speed of the falling magnet, leading to greater resistance. Overall, the discussion confirms the validity of the teacher's explanation and encourages further exploration of the topic for deeper understanding.
Miracles
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My physics teacher explained to our class the traditional "dropping a magnet through a tube" experiment. As we all know, it slows down and takes longer than usual to fall through. However, he gave us an explanation that I am unsure about. I seem to remember reading about a different explanation and a different pattern of induced currents from another book, but I don't remember it that well. His explanation is as follow:

Suppose we drop a magnet with the south pole facing downward:
|---|
|---| <---position A
| N |
| S |
|---| <---position B
|---|
At position A, to create a field that prevents the magnet from falling, a field similar to a magnet with north pointing up, south pointing down is created. Hence, by right hand screw rule, the current is counterclockwise, looking from the top of the tube.
At position B, for the same reason, a field with south pointing up and north pointing down is created. Hence, the current is clockwise looking from the top.

I can't find anything wrong with the explanation, but it sounds somewhat suspicious that the current directions at two different positions would be in opposite directions. Not to mention that as the magnet moves downward, the clockwise and counterclockwise currents move downwards too.

Can anyone confirm if this explanation is really valid please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Miracles said:
Can anyone confirm if this explanation is really valid please?
It is. The direction of the induced current depends on the direction of the magnetic field and the direction of motion. The direction of motion does not change but the direction of the field does (ie. N pole changes to S pole) between the magnet entering the tube and the field as it is leaving.

AM
 


The explanation given by your physics teacher is indeed valid. When a magnet is dropped through a tube, it creates a changing magnetic field. This changing magnetic field induces an electric current in the tube, which in turn creates a magnetic field that opposes the motion of the magnet. This is known as Lenz's law.

At position A, the magnet is approaching the bottom of the tube, so the induced current creates a magnetic field that repels the magnet and slows it down. At position B, the magnet is moving away from the bottom of the tube, so the induced current creates a magnetic field that attracts the magnet and slows it down. This is why the currents at these two positions are in opposite directions.

As for the current directions moving downwards with the magnet, this is due to the fact that the magnet is constantly creating a changing magnetic field as it moves, which in turn induces a current in the tube. The direction of this current is always opposite to the direction of the changing magnetic field, which in this case is downwards.

It is also worth noting that the strength of the induced currents and the resulting magnetic fields depends on the speed at which the magnet is dropped. The faster the magnet is dropped, the stronger the induced currents and the more resistance the magnet will experience as it falls through the tube.

Overall, your teacher's explanation is accurate and in line with the principles of electromagnetism. If you are still unsure or have any further questions, I would recommend discussing it with your teacher or doing some additional research to solidify your understanding.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top