Is Neutron Decay Consistent with Einstein's Mass-Energy Relationship?

AI Thread Summary
The free neutron decays into a proton, electron, and antineutrino, with the decay products exhibiting a total kinetic energy of 0.781±0.005 MeV. Calculations show a discrepancy between the predicted excess energy from Einstein's mass-energy relationship and the measured kinetic energy. Factors such as measurement uncertainty, potential unaccounted energy forms like gamma rays, and variations in neutron mass may explain this inconsistency. Despite the differences, the results remain consistent with Einstein's relationship, supporting its validity in physics. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of particle decay and energy conservation principles.
mike217
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The free neutron is known to decay into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino v' (of negligible rest mass) according to n-->p+e+v'. The decay products are measured to have a total kinetic energy of 0.781+/-0.005 MeV. Show that this observation is consistent with the excess energy predicted by Einstein's mass-energy relationship.

Doing this problem I get: (Mn-Mp-Me)c^2=(940 MeV/c^2-938 MeV/c^2-0.511 MeV/c^2)c^2=1.489 MeV which is not equal to the change in kinetic energy 0.781+/-0.005 MeV
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get .785 MeV. Try using more accurate numbers. See eg: http://www.mcelwee.net/html/table_of_physical_constants.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.

There are a few factors that could explain this discrepancy. First, the measured kinetic energy of the decay products is given with an uncertainty of +/-0.005 MeV, so it is possible that the actual value falls within this range and is consistent with the excess energy predicted by Einstein's mass-energy relationship.

Second, there may be other forms of energy involved in the decay process that are not accounted for in the simple equation used to calculate the excess energy. For example, there may be energy released in the form of gamma rays or other particles that are not included in the calculation.

Lastly, it is important to note that the mass of a neutron is not a fixed value, but can vary slightly depending on its energy and environment. This can also contribute to the discrepancy in the calculated excess energy.

Overall, while the observed kinetic energy of the decay products may not match exactly with the excess energy predicted by Einstein's mass-energy relationship, it is still consistent with the concept and provides further evidence for the validity of this fundamental relationship in physics.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top