I Is ##p^k = \partial L / \partial \dot{x}^k## true for all ##L##'s?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between generalized momentum and the Lagrangian in classical mechanics, specifically questioning whether the equation p^k = ∂L/∂dot{x}^k holds for all Lagrangians. An example using the Lagrangian L = T - U = (1/2)mv^2 - U demonstrates that the equation is valid for this case, yielding p^k = m dot{x}^k. The conversation seeks to establish a general proof for this relationship across all Lagrangians. A reference to generalized coordinates is provided to support the discussion. The inquiry highlights the need for a deeper understanding of momentum definitions in the context of Lagrangian mechanics.
Kostik
Messages
269
Reaction score
32
TL;DR Summary
Is the relation Is ##p^k = \partial L / \partial \dot{x}^k## true for all Lagrangians?
Using the Lagrangian $$L=T-U=\frac{1}{2}mv^2-U$$ we clearly have $$ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}^k} = m\dot{x}^k = p^k $$ i.e., the ##k##'th component of momentum. How does one show that the relation $$p^k = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}^k} $$ holds for all Lagrangians?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
“The generalized momentum "canonically conjugate to" the coordinate qi is defined by

{\displaystyle p_{i}={\frac {\partial L}{\partial {\dot {q}}_{i}}}.}
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_coordinates
 
Thanks. I did not phrase the question very well. I have made a more detailed post of the question here:
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top