Is quantum mechanics necessary for nuclear engineer?

AI Thread Summary
Quantum mechanics (QM) and special relativity (SR) are important for nuclear engineering, particularly in areas like microscopic cross-section calculations, neutron physics, and radiation effects. However, not all aspects of nuclear engineering require an in-depth understanding of QM; fields such as heat transfer and fluid mechanics do not necessitate it. A focus on the relevant parts of modern physics is essential for bridging the gap between mechanical and nuclear engineering. Understanding the specific applications of QM in nuclear contexts can enhance one's expertise. A targeted study in these areas will be beneficial for a successful career in nuclear engineering.
ahmad_adyleh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I graduated as mechanical engineer and I am studying master in nuclear engineering in Russia ,so to fill the gap between mechanical engineering and nuclear engineering I have to study some course in physics ,but is quantum mechanics necessary for nuclear engineer and which part of modern physics I should study ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ahmad_adyleh said:
Hi all, I graduated as mechanical engineer and I am studying master in nuclear engineering in Russia ,so to fill the gap between mechanical engineering and nuclear engineering I have to study some course in physics ,but is quantum mechanics necessary for nuclear engineer and which part of modern physics I should study ?
Some aspects of QM and SR are necessary for nuclear engineering if one is studying or working in certain aspects of microscopic (nuclear) cross-section calculations or neutron (reactor) physics, radiation effects in materials or shielding studies. There are some aspects in engineering, e.g., heat transfer or fluid mechanis where QM is not necessary.
 

Thread 'MCNP6 BURN Card Issue: Zero Burnup for Material in Fuel Assembly'

Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information（power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.） for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
View full post »

Thread 'Beginner Seeking Help: MCNP6 Burnup Example (OECD-NEA Benchmark)'

Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
View full post »

Similar threads

Computation for nuclear reactor systems
Replies
1
Views
3K
Can Any Country Achieve Net Zero Without Nuclear?
4
Replies
191
Views
12K
Modeling and Simulation in Nuclear Energy
Replies
1
Views
2K
Nuclear Energy reading material
Replies
9
Views
3K
What's the best major between Physics & Chemistry for entering MS in Nuclear Engineering?
Replies
12
Views
2K
First-Year Undergraduate Nuclear Fusion Advice for Experience?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Civilian Nuclear Engineer at Naval Shipyard
Replies
8
Views
4K
Other Which branch of engineering is more physics heavy?
Replies
39
Views
309
Is a Career in Nuclear Engineering Promising for an Arab/Jordanian Student?
Replies
5
Views
2K
MCNP and simple nuclear physics
Replies
9
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top