Is the Force on Box A Correctly Calculated?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted by box B on box A in a system of three boxes on a frictionless surface. The user questions their teacher's method, which involved isolating box B and using net force calculations, specifically noting confusion over the use of negative signs in the equations. They propose an alternative approach by calculating the net forces on both boxes B and C together. The user seeks validation of their method and expresses frustration over the lack of responses. The thread highlights the importance of understanding Newton's Third Law and the correct application of force direction in calculations.
Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Newton's Third Law problem

Homework Statement


Three boxes, A, B, and C, are positioned next to each other on a horizontal, frictionless surface. An applied force acting on box A causes all the boxes to accelerate at 1.5m/s^{2}
. Calculate the force that box B exerts on box A.

http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/8836/thirdlaw2cf8.png​
[/URL]

Homework Equations


F_{A on B}= -F_{B on A}
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


What seems to be the issue is how my teacher solved this problem. I have only realized this problem, so I can't have asked her personally. What she did is isolate box B and find the F_{net} acting on it. This is the calculation she did:

F_{net}= F_{A on B}-F_{C on B}
F_{net}= m_{B}a -(-7.5 N)
F_{net}= (10 Kg)(1.5m/s^{2}) + 7.5 N
F_{net}= 23 N


However, what confused me is the two negative signs she put infront of the 7.5 N. I think only one would suffice to take into consideration that F_{C on B} is a negative value, being that its direction is left.

I solved this problem taking a different approach. I found F_{net} of box B and C, and added them together. Here are my calculations:

F_{net}= m_{B}a + m_{C}a
F_{net}= (10 Kg)(1.5m/s^{2}) + (5.0 Kg)(1.5m/s^{2})
F_{net}= 23 N


Could someone please confirm whether my method of solving the problem is correct or not?​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?

Is their something wrong or confusing with my post that nobody has replied yet?
 
...

...anyone please?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top