Is the given force equation conservative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The force equation given, ## \vec F= (-kx + ax^3 +bx^4)\vec i##, is determined to be conservative based on the criteria that the work done by the force depends only on the endpoints and not the path taken. The integral condition for a conservative force, ## \oint \vec F \cdot \vec{dl}=0 ## for all closed paths, confirms this. Additionally, the curl of the force field, ## \vec \nabla \times \vec F=0 ##, indicates that the force is conservative. The potential energy function can be derived from the force, and it is not equal to zero; rather, it is defined relative to a reference point. Thus, the force in question is conservative, allowing for the existence of a potential energy function.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A particular spring obeys the force law ## \vec F= (-kx + ax^3 +bx^4)\vec i##. Is this force conservative? Explain why or why not.

Homework Equations


Conservative forces depend on the beginning and endpoints, but not the path taken.

The Attempt at a Solution


The given equation for force clearly depends on ##x##, which is distance. Therefore, this force is non-conservative. Additionally, if ##\vec F## depends on ##x##, then the graph of F vs dl will vary depending on what value of ##x## is plugged in. Work (which is change in energy) will not be constant, so once again force is not conserved. My answer is incorrect, according to my solutions guide. Where did I mess up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's where you messed up:
Calpalned said:
Conservative forces depend on the beginning and endpoints, but not the path taken.
This is wrong. Conservative forces are forces that their work on a particle in moving it from one point to another, doesn't depend on the path taken and only depends on the two points. This is equivalent to saying that a force is conservative if and only if ## \oint \vec F \cdot \vec{dl}=0 ## for all closed paths. It can be proved that this is equivalent to ## \vec \nabla \times \vec F=0 ##. So the latter equation is a good way of finding out whether a force field is conservative or not.
 
Shyan said:
Here's where you messed up:

This is wrong. Conservative forces are forces that their work on a particle in moving it from one point to another, doesn't depend on the path taken and only depends on the two points. This is equivalent to saying that a force is conservative if and only if ## \oint \vec F \cdot \vec{dl}=0 ## for all closed paths. It can be proved that this is equivalent to ## \vec \nabla \times \vec F=0 ##. So the latter equation is a good way of finding out whether a force field is conservative or not.
What does the symbol integral with circle mean?

The second part of the question asks me to find the potential energy function, which is the integral of ## \vec F ##. If force is conservative, then the potential energy function is equal to zero right?
 
Calpalned said:
What does the symbol integral with circle mean?
It means the line integral is taken over a closed path.
Calpalned said:
The second part of the question asks me to find the potential energy function, which is the integral of ##\vec F## . If force is conservative, then the potential energy function is equal to zero right?
No. To obtain the potential energy from the force field, you should use ## \phi(\vec r)=-\int_{\vec{r}_{ref}}^{\vec r} \vec F \cdot \vec{dl} ## where ## \phi(\vec r _{ref}) ## is defined to be zero, i.e. the point where potential becomes zero is arbitrary.
 
In one dimension (as it is this case) a force ##\vec{F}## is conservative if and only if there is a function ##\phi(x)## such that ##\vec{F} = -\frac{d}{dx}\phi(x) \vec{i}##

In your example the force is a continuous function of the position ##x## so the above is satisfied (i.e. the force is conservative).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top