Is the Heat Equation Model for an Insulated Rod Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the heat equation model for an insulated rod, specifically addressing the correct interpretation of boundary conditions and heat supply terms. The equation derived is correct, but clarification is needed on the distinction between total heat (S) and heat per length (s). The derivative at the boundary must specify the location, particularly at x=L, to be meaningful. The application of Fourier's law confirms the relationship between total heat flow and the heat per length. Overall, the participants agree that the calculations and interpretations align with the principles of heat conduction.
dirk_mec1
Messages
755
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/7641/20240456gw8.png

Homework Equations


http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/5879/63445047rj2.png

Note that the rightside of the rod is insulated.

The Attempt at a Solution


I get this model:

\frac{ \partial{u} }{ \partial{t} } = \kappa \frac{ \partial{ ^2 u} }{ \partial{x^2} } +s

u(0,t)=u_0
\frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} } = 0In steady state this gives: u(x) = \frac{- s}{ \kappa} \frac{1}{2}x^2 + \frac{s}{ \kappa } L x + u_0

But if I calcute than the asked u' at x=0:

I get:

\frac{du}{dx} = \frac{s}{ \kappa} L

Is this correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What I don't understand is what do they mean by "total heat supply"? I presume they mean s (=source). But I get a different answer out of my equation.
 
Your answer looks fine. Note, though, that the equation

<br /> \frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} } = 0<br />

means nothing on its own; we need to specify a location:

<br /> \left(\frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} }\right)_{x=L} = 0<br />

For the heat supply question: we need to distinguish the total heat S from the heat per length s=S/L that goes into the differential equation. By applying Fourier's conduction law, your answer indicates a total heat flow of sL=S, which is correct. The units will always confirm whether S or s is being used appropriately.
 
Mapes said:
Your answer looks fine. Note, though, that the equation

<br /> \frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} } = 0<br />

means nothing on its own; we need to specify a location:

<br /> \left(\frac{ \partial{u}} { \partial{x} }\right)_{x=L} = 0<br />
You're right but I couldn't get this in latex. Note that the notation you are using isn't the right one either there should be a large bar at the right hand side something like this: |_{x=L}

For the heat supply question: we need to distinguish the total heat S from the heat per length s=S/L that goes into the differential equation. By applying Fourier's conduction law, your answer indicates a total heat flow of sL=S, which is correct. The units will always confirm whether S or s is being used appropriately.
Of ocurse, how could I overlooked that!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top