Is the Loss of Kinetic Energy Related to the Volume of a Copper Atom?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework question regarding the loss of kinetic energy related to the volume of a copper atom. Participants express confusion over calculations in part c, specifically the discrepancy in speed after impact, which was clarified to be 0.532 m/s instead of 0.153 m/s. The loss in kinetic energy calculations remained consistent despite the initial misunderstanding. Additionally, the atomic volume of copper was found to be approximately 1.182 x 10^-29 m^3, suggesting a rough alignment with other values discussed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate calculations and assumptions in physics problems.
Bolter
Messages
262
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
Work out the overall loss in kinetic energy
Relevant Equations
P=mv
PE = mgh
KE = 1/2mv^2
Unsure on whether I have done part d) right for this question

Screenshot 2019-12-20 at 19.07.18.png


Here is what I have done already:

IMG_3523.JPG


IMG_3524.JPG


Any help would be great! Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't understand your calculation in part c. You had 0.532 m/s for A's speed after impact, but it became 0.153 somehow.
 
Bolter said:
Homework Statement:: Work out the overall loss in kinetic energy
Homework Equations:: P=mv
PE = mgh
KE = 1/2mv^2

Unsure on whether I have done part d) right for this question

View attachment 254437

Here is what I have done already:

Any help would be great! Thanks

Looks okay to me.

What are your assumptions for part e)? Did you try googling for volume of copper atom?
 
haruspex said:
I didn't understand your calculation in part c. You had 0.532 m/s for A's speed after impact, but it became 0.153 somehow.

Sorry you are correct. A's speed after impact should have read 0.532 m/s. I don't know why but I misinterpreted it as 0.153 for some apparent reason :headbang:

EDIT: my loss in KE still comes out to be the same as I remember punching in 0.532 m/s onto the calculator.
 
PeroK said:
Looks okay to me.

What are your assumptions for part e)? Did you try googling for volume of copper atom?

I have done a quick google search, and the atomic volume of copper comes out to be '1.182 x 10^-29 m^3' so both values are of the same magnitude roughly. For assumptions, I'm not too certain.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top