Is the magnetic field B→. a state function and exact differential?

johankep
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
. a state function and exact differential?
Relevant Equations
state functions
is the magnetic field B→. a state function and exact differential?

I argued that it's a state function, what do you guys think
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
johankep said:
Homework Statement:: . a state function and exact differential?
Relevant Equations:: state functions

is the magnetic field B→. a state function and exact differential?

I argued that it's a state function, what do you guys think
I'm not sure if it makes sense to distinguish between state functions and non-state functions outside the field of thermodynamics.
How did you argue that B is a state function.

However, E is an exact differential in electrostatics since it is the gradient of a scalar field.
B is not the gradient of a scalar field.
 
Philip Koeck said:
I'm not sure if it makes sense to distinguish between state functions and non-state functions outside the field of thermodynamics.
How did you argue that B is a state function.

However, E is an exact differential in electrostatics since it is the gradient of a scalar field.
B is not the gradient of a scalar field.

Thanks for the reply Philip
regarding your question, this is the context of B here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_Thermodynamic_Systems

 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
Philip Koeck said:
I'm not sure if it makes sense to distinguish between state functions and non-state functions outside the field of thermodynamics.
How did you argue that B is a state function.

However, E is an exact differential in electrostatics since it is the gradient of a scalar field.
B is not the gradient of a scalar field.
Sorry forget to say..my argument was that since B can be measured knowing its current value(state) only..then it's a state function but I'm not sure to be honest if my reasoning correct
 
johankep said:
Thanks for the reply Philip
regarding your question, this is the context of B here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_Thermodynamic_Systems
Now I see why you ask. In a thermodynamic context I guess it can be important whether B is a state function or not.
I don't understand very much about this, I'm afraid, but I'm a bit surprised about the equations in the wikipedia article.
In the second equation p dV is not integrated, whereas the other 3 terms are. Probably just a typo.
What worries me more is the last term which contains both a ΔB and a dV in the integrand. Is that really correct? Do you have a derivation? Maybe it should say B rather than ΔB.
B is not an extensive quantity, so I wouldn't expect it to show up as a difference or differential in the fundamental equation.
Then the integration over V is also strange. Which V? V is one of the quantities that changes.
 
Philip Koeck said:
Now I see why you ask. In a thermodynamic context I guess it can be important whether B is a state function or not.
I don't understand very much about this, I'm afraid, but I'm a bit surprised about the equations in the wikipedia article.
In the second equation p dV is not integrated, whereas the other 3 terms are. Probably just a typo.
What worries me more is the last term which contains both a ΔB and a dV in the integrand. Is that really correct? Do you have a derivation? Maybe it should say B rather than ΔB.
B is not an extensive quantity, so I wouldn't expect it to show up as a difference or differential in the fundamental equation.
Then the integration over V is also strange. Which V? V is one of the quantities that changes.

I asked a professor his answer was "B and E are thermodynamic parameters, measurable macroscopic quantities associated to the system therefore they are state functions"... I don't think I fully understand his answer.. but yeah this is it
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top