Is the Maxwell Speed Distribution Applicable in an Ideal Gas with Fixed Energy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the Maxwell speed distribution applies to an ideal gas with a fixed energy in a constrained phase space. It explores the scenario of n particles in a unit box, where the phase space is defined and a surface of constant energy is established. The inquiry questions if, as n approaches infinity, the velocity distribution of a particle in this setup converges to the Maxwell speed distribution. The usual derivation of the Maxwell distribution involves particles interacting with an external reservoir, but this discussion considers the implications of a fixed total energy. Ultimately, the question seeks to clarify the relationship between uniform probability distributions over energy-constrained systems and the Maxwell speed distribution.
yall
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I want to know if the Maxwell speed distribution is the following.

An ideal gas system of n particles, say constrained to the unit box, has the phase space ([0,1]^3 x R^3)^n. That is, [0,1]^3 for the position of a particle, R^3 for the velocity, and all to the n since there are n particles. Now in this space we can take the surface of constant energy say E=n/2, so that the average energy of a single particle is 1. This surface has finite surface area, so we can put a uniform probability distribution on it, and ask what the distribution of the first particle's velocity is.

Is said distribution the Maxwell speed distribution, in the limit as n->infinity?

In other words, is the Maxwell speed distribution just the distribution for the velocity of a particle found in a system chosen uniformly over all systems of the same energy E?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual derivation assumes that the particles are in contact with some external reservoir and that the total energy can vary a bit. In the limit of infinite particles, I would expect that an exact energy gives the correct result, too.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top