Is the normalisation constant of a wavefunction real?

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



Consider the wavefunction ##\Psi (x, t) = c\ \psi (x) e^{-iEt/ \hbar}## such that ##\int | \Psi (x, t) |^{2} dx = 1##.

I would like to prove to myself that the normalisation factor ##c## is a real number.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



##\int | \Psi (x, t) |^{2} dx = 1##

##\int c\ \psi (x)\ e^{-iEt/ \hbar}\ c^{*}\ \psi^{*}(x)\ e^{iEt/ \hbar}\ dx = 1##

##\int c\ \psi (x)\ c^{*}\ \psi^{*}(x)\ dx = 1##

##\int |c|^{2}\ |\psi (x)|^{2}\ dx = 1##

This isn't getting me anywhere, though! :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot prove this, quantum mechanics is fine with redefining all phases by the same phase factor and the physics does not depend on the phase of a state. It only depends on the relative phase of interfering states. However, you may choose the normalisation constant to be real for this very reason.
 
  • Like
Likes Noctisdark
Thanks!

I knew that the phase factors are tunable, but I was not able to see that this could account for the plausibility of a real normalisation constant.

Now, it's all clear!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top