Is the Solution to This Differential Equation Unique?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the uniqueness of solutions to a differential equation defined by dy/dt = F(t,y). It is established that the solutions y1 = -1 and y2 = 1 + t^2 are both valid but not equal, indicating that the solution is not unique. The initial condition y(0) = 0 does not ensure uniqueness since both solutions satisfy it. Additionally, the Picard-Lindelöf theorem's criteria, which include continuity and the Lipschitz condition for F(t,y), are not met in this case. Therefore, the conclusion is that the solution is not unique due to the presence of multiple distinct solutions.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
Doing a problem on the Uniqueness Theorem and i do not understand it

Can you help me by explaining why this example is unique or not, please?

Given \frac{dy}{dt} =F(t,y)
Also y_{1} = -1 for all t that are solutions
And y_{2} = 1+ t^2 for all t that are solutions
and y(0) = 0

Is the solution unique or not?

I think it is because y1(0) < y(0) <y2(0) . Is that the only criterion for uniqueness or is there something more?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can someone simply explain the criteria for uniqueness for me?\

Maybe then i could get ahead on this problem!
 


The uniqueness theorem states that if a differential equation has a unique solution, then any two solutions to the equation must be equal. In this case, the solution is not unique because y1 and y2 are both solutions to the given differential equation, but they are not equal. This can be seen by plugging in t=0, where y1(0)=-1 and y2(0)=1. Therefore, the solution is not unique.

To determine the uniqueness of a solution, we also need to consider the initial condition. In this case, both y1 and y2 satisfy the given initial condition of y(0)=0. However, this does not guarantee uniqueness. We need to also consider the behavior of the functions F(t,y) and whether they satisfy the conditions of the Picard-Lindelöf theorem. This theorem states that if F(t,y) is continuous and satisfies a Lipschitz condition with respect to y, then the solution to the differential equation is unique.

In summary, the solution is not unique in this case because the two solutions do not equal each other, and the conditions of the Picard-Lindelöf theorem are not satisfied. If the conditions were satisfied, then the solution would be unique. I hope this helps to clarify the concept of uniqueness in differential equations.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top