Is the T=2*q*A Formula Valid for Both Open and Closed Thin-Walled Members?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of the formula T=2*q*A for calculating torque in both open and closed thin-walled members. Participants question whether the formula applies universally or if it is limited to specific conditions. There is a focus on the implications of physical properties in the context of the formula's application. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on the distinctions between open and closed sections in structural analysis. Ultimately, the validity of the formula remains a point of contention among the contributors.
aerosiyar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
is T=2*q*A formuala valid for both open thin-walled and closed thin-walled members, where T is torque, q is shear flow, and A is the Area.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
aerosiyar said:
is T=2*q*A formuala valid for both open thin-walled and closed thin-walled members, where T is torque, q is shear flow, and A is the Area.
Are there no physical properties involved?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top