Is the Total Charge of Polarization in a Non-Homogeneous Dielectric Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the total charge of polarization in a non-homogeneous dielectric caused by a conducting sphere. The user successfully calculated the volume density of polarization charge, ρ', and the surface density, σ', but struggled with integrating to find the total volume charge. The correct approach involves considering a shell with charge dq = ρ(r) dV, where dV is the volume of the shell, leading to the conclusion that the total charge of polarization equals zero. The integration method clarified the misunderstanding regarding the divergence of the total volume density. Overall, the total charge of polarization in the dielectric is confirmed to be zero.
Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Consider an infinite environment with electrical permittivity non-homogeneous $$\epsilon=\epsilon_0(1+a/r)$$ a being a positive constant. A conducting sphere of radius R and charge Q is put on that environment, centered at r=0. Determine the electric field $$E$$, the electrical potential $$V$$, the volume density of polarization charge $$\rho'$$ and the surface density of polarization charge $$\sigma'$$. Prove that the total charge of polarization in the dielectric is zero.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So I'm having a lot of trouble with the last part of the question.
I got for the the volume density of polarization charge $\rho'$ and the surface density of polarization charge $$\sigma'$$:

$$\rho'= \frac{Qa}{4\pi r^2(r+a)^2}$$
for $$r>R$$

$$\sigma'= \frac{-Qa}{4\pi R^2(R+a)}$$
for $$r=R$$

Now I now that the total charge will be the sum of the total charge in surface with the total charge in volume. Total charge in surface is easy.
$$Q'_{surface}=4\pi R^2\sigma'= \frac{-Qa}{(R+a)}$$

However I'm not quite sure on how to compute the total volume density. I thought it might be an integral from R to infinity of

$$\frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 \frac{Qa}{4 \pi r^2 (r+a)^2}=\frac{Qar}{3(r+a)^2}$$

but the integral of that expression on those boundaries diverge.
What should I do then?
Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot multiply the density by the volume the way you did to get a "charge" at r and then evaluate as r goes to ∞. You need to consider a shell that has charge dq = ρ(r) dV, then integrate. What's dV for a shell of radius r and thickness dr?
 
Oh! The volume of the shell is $$dV=4\pi r^2 dr$$. This way I get to the total charge equaling zero. Thank you very much!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top