Is this correct without a direction in metres?

  • Thread starter Thread starter barthayn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a rocket-powered hockey puck moving on a frictionless table. The puck's direction at t = 2s is calculated to be 62 degrees from the x-axis, based on its velocity components. For the distance from the origin at t = 5s, initial calculations suggested 250 cm, but further analysis revealed that the correct method involves calculating the area under the velocity-time graph, leading to a final displacement of approximately 180.27 cm. Participants clarify that the angle is not needed for the distance calculation, which should focus solely on magnitude. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting displacement and velocity in physics problems.
barthayn
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rocket-powered hockey puck moves on a horizontal frictionless table. Figure EX4.8 at the top of the next column shows graphs of vx and vy, the x- and y-components of the puck's velocity. The puck starts at the origin.

a. In which direction is the puck moving at t = 2s? Give your answer as an angle from the x-axis.
b. How far from the origin is the puck at t = 5s?

The graph of the X-velocity is v=8t cm/s and the Y-velocity is V=30cm/s

Homework Equations



c^2 = a^2 + b^2
d = vt
m= dy/dx

The Attempt at a Solution



a. vx = 16 cm/s. vy = 30cm/s. θ = tan (30/16)^-1 = 62^o. Therefore the puck is traveling in the direction of 62^0 from the x-axis.

b. vx = 8* 5 = 40cm/s
dx = 40*5 = 200cm

dy= 30*5 = 150cm

c = (4000+2250)^0.5 = 250cm

Therefore, the puck is 250 cm from the origin.

My question are these:

For a I do not need to add the displacement of it, correct? Just the angle is good enough right? In high school there was never a question that did not involve the magnitude of the displacement.

Secondly. Is the position traveled from the origin correct as well? I am asking this because I am a bit confused because the position function for x-direction is 4x^2. It shouldn't matter if it is linear or not correct. I can still do it the way I solved it correct? As well for b, I do not need to include the angle because it is asking for the magnitude of the displacement, correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your (a) looks correct.

b. vx = 8* 5 = 40cm/s
dx = 40*5 = 200cm

200 cm is the distance it would have covered were it traveling at a constant speed of 40cm/s since the start. It has been traveling at less than this all the while, so your answer cannot be correct.

You need to find the displacement (from the origin) at time t=5 secs. The magnitude of this gives you the distance from the origin at t=5. Displacement is found as the area under the v-t graph. You have the graph, so you can work out the area under it.

Area has units. What units will the area under your v-t graph have?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Your (a) looks correct.



200 cm is the distance it would have covered were it traveling at a constant speed of 40cm/s since the start. It has been traveling at less than this all the while, so your answer cannot be correct.

You need to find the displacement (from the origin) at time t=5 secs. The magnitude of this gives you the distance from the origin at t=5. Displacement is found as the area under the v-t graph. You have the graph, so you can work out the area under it.

Area has units. What units will the area under your v-t graph have?

Thanks, I forgot to half the area found because it was a triangle. To prove me correct I took the integral. I got 100 cm from x. So the final answer is 180.27cm from the origin, correct?
 
My answer is 180.27cm also.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top