Is this nuclear physics question's answer correct?

Toyona10
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the power output of a reactor fueled by uranium-235 if it takes 30 days to use up 10 Kg of fuel and if each fission gives 200 MeV of energy.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(I was absent that day so this answer is from someone else's notebook)
No of U-235 nuclei in 10 kg:
(6.023*10^23*10000)/235 = 2.56*10^25

Fission rate= (2.56*10^25)/(30*24*3600)= 9.76*10^18 J/s (?? how is it joules per second, isn't that number above just no. of nuclei?)

Therefore, energy produced through fission per second:
= 200* 9.76*10^18= 1.95*10^15 MW

So...is this correct?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toyona10 said:

Homework Statement



What is the power output of a reactor fueled by uranium-235 if it takes 30 days to use up 10 Kg of fuel and if each fission gives 200 MeV of energy.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(I was absent that day so this answer is from someone else's notebook)
No of U-235 nuclei in 10 kg:
(6.023*10^23*10000)/235 = 2.56*10^25

Fission rate= (2.56*10^25)/(30*24*3600)= 9.76*10^18 J/s (?? how is it joules per second, isn't that number above just no. of nuclei?)

Therefore, energy produced through fission per second:
= 200* 9.76*10^18= 1.95*10^15 MW

So...is this correct?
Thank you

As you notice above, because those calculations don't carry the units through from left to right, it's hard to figure out if things are correct by dimensional analysis alone. So you will want to start out by defining each factor introduced along with their correct units. When you do this, you quickly realize that the calculations don't make sense because the units don't work out.

For example,

(6.023*10^23*10000)/235 = 2.56*10^25

is missing a conversion from atomic mass units to grams. The fission rate is, as you noticed, not in J/s. Finally

= 200* 9.76*10^18= 1.95*10^15 MW

doesn't account for the fact that when we list an energy in MeV, we really mean MeV/c^2, where c is the speed of light. In order to obtain an expression in SI units, we need to use the value of c to convert units.

There could be other problems, but these were the most obvious ones. Hopefully it gives you a good idea of how to do the correct calculation.
 
fzero said:
As you notice above, because those calculations don't carry the units through from left to right, it's hard to figure out if things are correct by dimensional analysis alone. So you will want to start out by defining each factor introduced along with their correct units. When you do this, you quickly realize that the calculations don't make sense because the units don't work out.

For example,

(6.023*10^23*10000)/235 = 2.56*10^25

is missing a conversion from atomic mass units to grams. The fission rate is, as you noticed, not in J/s. Finally

= 200* 9.76*10^18= 1.95*10^15 MW

doesn't account for the fact that when we list an energy in MeV, we really mean MeV/c^2, where c is the speed of light. In order to obtain an expression in SI units, we need to use the value of c to convert units.

There could be other problems, but these were the most obvious ones. Hopefully it gives you a good idea of how to do the correct calculation.

Hmmm...lol

well, this is how I tried it:
total energy= energy per fission*no of atoms
= 200 MeV * 2.56*10^25
=8.19*10^14 J
so Pout=total E / time =(8.19*10^14)/(30*24*3600)
=315.97MW
 
Toyona10 said:
Hmmm...lol

well, this is how I tried it:
total energy= energy per fission*no of atoms
= 200 MeV * 2.56*10^25
=8.19*10^14 J
so Pout=total E / time =(8.19*10^14)/(30*24*3600)
=315.97MW

That looks better, but I haven't looked up the precise conversion factors, so I'm just assuming you have them correct. I'd round it off to 2 or 3 significant digits, since the way the number of atoms was computed was rough.
 
htrytr said:
agree

to which one? the 1st answer or the second one? :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top