Is this right about Fusion and Fission?

  • Thread starter Thread starter salsabel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fission Fusion
AI Thread Summary
Fission involves the splitting of a nucleus into two smaller nuclei, while fusion combines two nuclei into one, with both processes releasing significant energy. The energy release occurs as the resulting products move closer to iron on the binding energy graph, as iron represents the most stable nucleus. In fusion, hydrogen fuses to form helium, which is closer to iron, thus releasing energy. In fission, uranium splits into smaller nuclei that also approach iron on the graph, leading to energy release. The discussion confirms that fusion of uranium and fission of helium do not yield energy, emphasizing the importance of nuclear stability in these reactions.
salsabel
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Fission is a process in which a nucleus splits into two parts that are roughly the same size of the original nucleus. In fusion, two nuclei fuse, or combine, to form one nucleus. These reactions seem to be opposite to each other and yet both release large amounts of energy. Explain why this is not a contradiction. Use the graph of binding energy per nucleon in your answer.

That's what I got
The energy is released as the products move closer to iron on the binding energy graph. This is as iron is the most stable nuclei. Hydrogen is on the left and the produced helium is closer to iron so it releases energy. Uranium is way on the right and the products are closer to iron so energy is released. This increase in stability is what causes energy to be released; this is pretty much the case for chemical reactions as well...
Most small stars die after iron has been produced in the core as it is not able to produce any more energy by fusing iron nuclei. Huge stars can fuse these nuclei but this is because they have so much energy and energy is actually used up in making heavier elements.

IS THAT RIGHT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thats exactly correct.
Fusion of uranium wouldn't produce energy; nor would fission of helium.
 
thank you
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top