Is this the right way to find Zeq for parallel circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the equivalent impedance (Zeq) for a parallel circuit involving a resistor and an inductor in series with a capacitor. The user initially calculates Zeq as 400Ω but questions whether the approach and the final value are correct. Feedback indicates that while the procedure is generally correct, the user needs to ensure proper units are included in their final answer. Additionally, there is confusion about how to apply the Vsource value in the equation provided. Clarification is given that the user ultimately arrives at the correct solution with assistance.
pokie_panda
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=58319&stc=1&d=1367181165.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/84781786@N03/8687383259/in/photostream/

Homework Equations



Vc=Vsource*Zeq/(200+Zeq)


The Attempt at a Solution



Is this the correct way to get Zeq
100Ω and inductor as series . so we
100+j100 parallel with the capacitor. which is -j100
so we use the formula Z1 + Z2//Z3
which we get 400

Is this correct
Also how do we multiply the Vsource value ?
 

Attachments

  • 8687383259_4835237175_b.jpg
    8687383259_4835237175_b.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 683
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
pokie_panda said:

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://www.flickr.com/photos/84781786@N03/8687383259/in/photostream/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/84781786@N03/8687383259/in/photostream/

Homework Equations



Vc=Vsource*Zeq/(200+Zeq)


The Attempt at a Solution



Is this the correct way to get Zeq
100Ω and inductor as series . so we
100+j100 parallel with the capacitor. which is -j100 \leftarrow should be -j200?
so we use the formula Z1 + Z2//Z3
which we get 400

Is this correct
Your description is a bit hard to follow, but it looks like you've got the right procedure. Your result has the correct magnitude, but lacks the appropriate units (that would lose you marks if submitted that way!).
Also how do we multiply the Vsource value ?
Multiply the Vsource? For what purpose?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I ended up getting the correct solution , thanks for your help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top