Is This Wavefunction a Valid Solution for the Schrödinger Equation?

beyondlight
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that this solution:

\psi(x,y,z)=Ae^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}

is a solution for this equation:

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \psi(x,y,z)=E\,\psi(x,y,z),

How is K related to E?

How does the corresponding timedependent function look like?



The Attempt at a Solution



My second derivative is:

\psi''(x,y,z)=i^{2}k_x^{2}A \cdot e^{ik_x*r} \cdot e^{ik_y*r} \cdot e^{ik_z*r} = -k_x^{2}A \cdot e^{ik_x*r} \cdot e^{ik_y*r} \cdot e^{ik_z*r}=-k_x^{2} \cdot \psi

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) \cdot \psi = E \cdot \psi

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) = E


I suppose it is enough to say that

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} (k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) is energy? So it automatically satisfies the S.E.? What is the unit of \psi?

But the relation between k and E should then be:

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \cdot (k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \cdot K = E

\frac{E}{K}= \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}


But the last task is a bit more tricky...I will just separate the time-depentent S.E.

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \psi = i\hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt}

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta = i\hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt} \cdot \frac{1}{\psi}

Can someone help me from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Welcome to Physics Forums.

beyondlight said:

Homework Statement



Show that this solution:

\psi(x,y,z)=Ae^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}

is a solution for this equation:

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \psi(x,y,z)=E\,\psi(x,y,z),

How is K related to E?

How does the corresponding timedependent function look like?



The Attempt at a Solution



My second derivative is:

\psi''(x,y,z)=i^{2}k_x^{2}A \cdot e^{ik_x*r} \cdot e^{ik_y*r} \cdot e^{ik_z*r} = -k_x^{2}A \cdot e^{ik_x*r} \cdot e^{ik_y*r} \cdot e^{ik_z*r}=-k_x^{2} \cdot \psi
Small correction: it really should be kxx, kyy, etc. here. And it looks like you are using ψ'' to mean ∂²ψ/∂x². But you have the right idea.

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) \cdot \psi = E \cdot \psi

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) = E


I suppose it is enough to say that

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} (k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) is energy? So it automatically satisfies the S.E.? What is the unit of \psi?

But the relation between k and E should then be:

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \cdot (k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + k_z^{2}) = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \cdot K = E

\frac{E}{K}= \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}

Close, but not quite. You are saying that

k_x^2 + k_y^2 + k_z^2 = k^1 ?​

I think you need to modify the k1 term, slightly, to have a true statement here.

But the last task is a bit more tricky...I will just separate the time-depentent S.E.

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \psi = i\hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt}

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta = i\hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt} \cdot \frac{1}{\psi}

Can someone help me from here?
Let's back up 1 step to

\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\Delta \psi = i\hbar \frac{d\psi}{dt}

Since ψ is a function of (x,y,z) only, we really need another symbol for the time-dependent part. It's common to assume the full wavefunction is the product of a spatial function (that's ψ(x,y,z) ) and a time-dependent function (call it f(t)). So you want to put ψ(x,y,z)·f(t) into the time-dependent Schrodinger Equation, and work out what f(t) is.

Hope that helps. By the way, \partial will give you the partial derivative symbol in LaTeX.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top